Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2 & Ors. v. State Bank of India
[Citation -2022-LL-0804-1]

Citation 2022-LL-0804-1
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2 & Ors.
Respondent Name State Bank of India
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/08/2022
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags material on record • change of opinion • reassessment proceedings
Bot Summary: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER We have heard Mr. N. Venkataraman, learned ASG, appearing for the petitioner(s) and Mr. S.K. Bagaria, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the respondent. Signature Not Verified We have gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.08.05 the High Court by which the High Court, vide detailed judgment and 16:49:11 IST Reason: order, has quashed and set aside the re-assessment proceedings and re-opening of the assessment in exercise of powers under Sections 2 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. From the material on record, it can be seen that the re-opening of the assessment was solely on change of opinion of the Assessing Officer and therefore, the High Court has rightly set aside the same. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court setting aside the re-assessment proceedings/re-opening of the assessment.


1 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21134/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-01-2019 in WP No. 3588/2018 passed by High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA Respondent(s) (IA No. 122865/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 04-08-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Venkataraman, ASG Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Mr. Mohammed Akhil, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. V Chandrashekhar Bharathi, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Ms. Megha Karnwal, Adv. Mr. Arjun Bhatia, Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER We have heard Mr. N. Venkataraman, learned ASG, appearing for petitioner(s) and Mr. S.K. Bagaria, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for respondent. Signature Not Verified We have gone through impugned judgment and order passed by Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.08.05 High Court by which High Court, vide detailed judgment and 16:49:11 IST Reason: order, has quashed and set aside re-assessment proceedings and re-opening of assessment in exercise of powers under Sections 2 147/148 of Income Tax Act. From material on record, it can be seen that re-opening of assessment was solely on change of opinion of Assessing Officer and therefore, High Court has rightly set aside same. We see no reason to interfere with impugned judgment and order passed by High Court. As such, we are in complete agreement with view taken by High Court setting aside re-assessment proceedings/re-opening of assessment. Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. Pending application stands disposed of. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2 & Ors. v. State Bank of India
Report Error