The Patteppadam Rural Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thrissur / The Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(4), Thrissur
[Citation -2020-LL-0820]

Citation 2020-LL-0820
Appellant Name The Patteppadam Rural Co-Operative Society Ltd.
Respondent Name The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thrissur / The Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(4), Thrissur
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/08/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags demand notice • stay petition
Bot Summary: No.17224 OF 2020(C) 2 JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1, P6 and P11 assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P3, P8 and P13 appeals as also Exts.P5, P10 and P15 stay petitions before the 1st respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that the issue involved in the appeal is the entitlement of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, and when the petitioner approached the 2 nd respondent under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, the said respondent had, by Exts.P4, P9 and P14 orders, directed the petitioner to pay 20 of the disputed amounts, as a pre-condition for stay of the remaining amount confirmed against the petitioner, pending disposal of the appeal. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in similar matters this Court has directed the appellate authority to consider and pass orders in the appeal and stayed the recovery proceedings, in the meanwhile. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Taking note of the orders passed by this Court in similar matters, I dispose the writ petition by quashing Exts.P4, P9 and P14 orders of the 2 nd respondent and directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3, P8 and P13 appeals within an outer time limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. I also make it clear that till such time as orders are passed by the 1st respondent in the appeal as directed above, and the order communicated to the petitioner, recovery steps pursuant to Exts.P2, P7 and P12 demand notices shall be kept in abeyance. No.17224 OF 2020(C) 3 a copy of this judgment together with a copy of the writ petition before the 1 st respondent for further action.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 29TH SRAVANA, 1942 WP(C).No.17224 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER/S: PATTEPPADAM RURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO. R 1040, P.O,KOTTANELLUR,THRISSUR-680672, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN SRI.K.S.ANIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AAYAKARA BHAVAN,S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001. 2 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (4),THRISSUR,OFFICE OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAM NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.08.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.17224 OF 2020(C) 2 JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1, P6 and P11 assessment orders under Income Tax Act, petitioner has preferred Exts.P3, P8 and P13 appeals as also Exts.P5, P10 and P15 stay petitions before 1st respondent. It is case of petitioner that issue involved in appeal is entitlement of deduction under Section 80P of Income Tax Act, and when petitioner approached 2 nd respondent under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, said respondent had, by Exts.P4, P9 and P14 orders, directed petitioner to pay 20% of disputed amounts, as pre-condition for stay of remaining amount confirmed against petitioner, pending disposal of appeal. It is stated by learned counsel for petitioner that in similar matters this Court has directed appellate authority to consider and pass orders in appeal and stayed recovery proceedings, in meanwhile. 2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner as also learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents. Taking note of orders passed by this Court in similar matters, I dispose writ petition by quashing Exts.P4, P9 and P14 orders of 2 nd respondent and directing 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3, P8 and P13 appeals within outer time limit of six months from date of receipt of copy of this judgment, after hearing petitioner. I also make it clear that till such time as orders are passed by 1st respondent in appeal as directed above, and order communicated to petitioner, recovery steps pursuant to Exts.P2, P7 and P12 demand notices shall be kept in abeyance. petitioner shall produce WP(C).No.17224 OF 2020(C) 3 copy of this judgment together with copy of writ petition before 1 st respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE sd WP(C).No.17224 OF 2020(C) 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET EXT.P2 COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 18.12.2018 EXT.P3 COPY OF APPEAL DATED 19.01.2019 EXT.P4 COPY OF ORDER DATED 15.10.2019 EXT.P5 COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 11.02.2020 EXT.P6 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.10.2019 ALONG WITH COMPUTATION SHEET. EXT.P7 COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 29.10.2019 EXT.P8 COPY OF APPEAL DATED 28.11.2019 EXT.P9 COPY OF ORDER DATED 21.01.2020 EXT.P10 COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 29.01.2020 EXT.P11 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 15.11.2019 EXT.P12 COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 15.11.2019 EXT.P13 COPY OF APPEAL DATED 11.12.2019 EXT.P14 COPY OF ORDER DATED 21.01.2020 EXT.P15 COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 29.01.2020 EXT.P16 COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 01.07.2019 IN W.A.NO.1536 OF 2019 Patteppadam Rural Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thrissur / Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(4), Thrissur
Report Error