Sabira M.A v. The Income-tax Officer Ward 3, Palakkad / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) Thrissur
[Citation -2020-LL-0713]
Citation | 2020-LL-0713 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Sabira M.A |
Respondent Name | The Income-tax Officer Ward 3, Palakkad / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) Thrissur |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 13/07/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | stay petition |
Bot Summary: | No.14025 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal together with Ext.P3 delay condonation application and Ext.P4 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that recovery steps have been taken by the respondent against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P1 assessment order even while the stay petition is pending consideration before the 2 nd respondent. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Sri.Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. The writ petition is disposed with the following directions: 1. The 2nd respondent shall consider and pass reasoned orders on Ext.P4 stay petition within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 2 nd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 2 nd respondent, for further action. |