Fathima v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1, Aluva / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kochi
[Citation -2020-LL-0604-11]
| Citation | 2020-LL-0604-11 |
|---|---|
| Appellant Name | Fathima |
| Respondent Name | The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1, Aluva / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kochi |
| Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
| Relevant Act | Income-tax |
| Date of Order | 04/06/2020 |
| Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
| Judgment | View Judgment |
| Keyword Tags | application for stay • stay of recovery |
| Bot Summary: | 690 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT T.R.Ravi, J. Against Ext.P1 assessment order issued by the 1 st respondent, for the year 2017-18, the appellant has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The appellant has also filed Ext.P3 application before the 2nd respondent praying for stay of the recovery steps initiated as per Ext.P4, pending disposal of the appeal. The appellant approached this Court praying that the 2nd respondent may be directed to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition. The writ petition has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge directing the 1st respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 application for stay filed along with Ext.P2 appeal within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge to the limited extent that the learned Judge has not granted stay of the recovery steps pending consideration of the application for stay as directed in the judgment. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and Adv.Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The writ appeal is allowed directing the 2 nd respondent to dispose of Ext.P3 application for stay, after hearing the appellant, within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. |