Laxmi Goel v. Income-tax Officer, Ward No.-36(3) Office of The Income-tax & Anr - 2020-LL-0316-10

Citation	2020-LL-0316-10
Appellant Name	Laxmi Goel
Respondent Name	Income-tax Officer, Ward No.-36(3) Office of The Income-tax & Anr.
Court	HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	16/03/2020
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	Learned counsel for the petitioners states that that the Assessing Officer has not yet passed the orders in the applications filed by the petitioners under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners also states that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, the said applications are disposed of by the Assessing Officer expeditiously. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to pass the orders in the applications filed by the petitioners under Section 220(6) of the Act, if not already passed, within the next two weeks. The petitions along with the pending applications stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. We make it clear that we have not made any observations on the merits of the claims of the petitioners.

21 & 22 IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2825/2020 & CM APPL. 9840/2020 LAXMI GOEL Petitioner Through Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate. versus 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 36(3) OFFICE OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Respondent Through Mr. Zohreb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counse, Revenue with Mr. Parth Samual, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue. W.P.(C) 2826/2020 & CM APPL. 9841/2020 BHARAT GOLA Petitioner Through Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. Respondents Through Mr. Zohreb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counse, Revenue with Mr. Parth Samual, Jr. Standing Counsel, Revenue. Date of Decision: 16th March, 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA W.P.(C) Nos.2825/2020 & 2826/2020 Page 1 of 2 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for petitioners states that that Assessing Officer has not yet passed orders in applications filed by petitioners under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as Act). Learned counsel for petitioners also states that petitioners would be satisfied, in case, said applications are disposed of by Assessing Officer expeditiously. 2. Accordingly, we direct Assessing Officer to pass orders in applications filed by petitioners under Section 220(6) of Act, if not already passed, within next two weeks. 3. petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in aforesaid terms. 4. We make it clear that we have not made any observations on merits of claims of petitioners. MANMOHAN, J SANJEEV NARULA, J MARCH 16, 2020 KA W.P.(C) Nos.2825/2020 & 2826/2020 Page 2 of 2 Laxmi Goel v. Income-tax Officer, Ward No.-36(3) Office of Income-tax & Anr

Metadata

Judgment