The Pathiyoor Farmers Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam/The Income-tax Officer, Ward No.3, Alappuzha
[Citation -2020-LL-0313-90]
Citation | 2020-LL-0313-90 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Pathiyoor Farmers Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. |
Respondent Name | The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam/The Income-tax Officer, Ward No.3, Alappuzha |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 13/03/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | stay petition • tax due • recovery proceeding |
Bot Summary: | No. 7883 of 2020 Dated this the 13th day of March, 2020 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Exhibit P1 assessment order, the petitioner has preferred Exhibit P2 appeal along with Exhibit P3 stay petition. Exhibit P4 is the order passed on the stay petition requiring the petitioner to remit 20 of the tax due, which is disputed in the appeal. The prayer in the writ petition is for expeditious consideration of the appeal and to stay the recovery proceedings including the insistence to pay 20 of the amount as demanded under Exhibit P4. 2. 1536 of 2019, after taking into consideration the Full Bench decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut 2020 KHC 2871, held that there shall not be any insistence for payment of 20 WP(C). The demand under Exhibit P4 being contrary to the decision of the Division Bench, Exhibit P4 cannot be sustained and is hence quashed. Considering the limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible. Till orders are passed on the appeal, recovery proceedings based on Exhibit P1 assessment order shall stand deferred and there shall not be any insistence for payment of the tax assessed. |