Sham Basheer v. ITO, Kottayam / The CIT(A), Kottayam
[Citation -2020-LL-0310-18]
Citation | 2020-LL-0310-18 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Sham Basheer |
Respondent Name | ITO, Kottayam / The CIT(A), Kottayam |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 10/03/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | application for stay • condonation of delay • stay petition • demand notice • interim stay |
Bot Summary: | No.7264 OF 2020(G) 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court against the assessment order dated 31.12.2019 for the assessment year 2017 preferred an appeal Ext.P2, stay application Ext.P3 and delay condonation application Ext.P3(a). The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the appeal the demand notice under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act along with the assessment order had already issued and therefore, the predicament of the petitioner is writ large. I am of the view that the petitioner s grievance for the time being can be only addressed by issuing directions to the 2nd respondent to consider the application for stay and condonation of delay for consideration of the interim prayer sought in terms of the memorandum of appeal was staying the demand, so that the fate can be decided. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to decide the application for condonation of delay and stay. No.7264 OF 2020(G) 3 from the receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. Till then the demand Ext.P4 or any future demand he prays during the interregnum is ordered to be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that the interim stay is only till the adjudication of stay and condonation delay application. |