Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-23 v. Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala - 2020-LL-0303-64

Citation	2020-LL-0303-64
Appellant Name	Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-23
Respondent Name	Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala
Court	HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	03/03/2020
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	tax effect
Bot Summary:	Heard Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for the appellant and Ms. Aasifa Khan, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee. On 29.01.2020, the following order was passed: 2. It is seen that dispute claim in the appeal is Rs.3,24,209. Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counsel, revenue to obtain instructions from the department as to whether this case is covered by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019. Today, when the matter is called upon, Mr. Walve, learned standing counsel fairly submits that the tax efect in this appeal is Rs.3,24,209. 00 which is well below the prescribed limit for fling of appeal before the High Court by the Income Tax Department in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1645 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23 Appellant Versus Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala Respondent Mr.Sham Walve a/w. Mr.Pritish Chatterji for Appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : MARCH 3, 2020. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for appellant and Ms. Aasifa Khan, learned counsel for respondent-assessee. 2. On 29.01.2020, following order was passed: 2. It is seen that dispute claim in appeal is Rs.3,24,209.00 as per own statement made by appellant. 3. Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counsel, revenue to obtain instructions from department as to whether this case is covered by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019. 3. Today, when matter is called upon, Mr. Walve, learned standing counsel fairly submits that tax efect in this appeal is Rs.3,24,209.00 which is well below prescribed limit for fling of appeal before High Court by Income Tax Department in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. 4. In view of above, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Court fee to be refunded as per rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-23 v. Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala

Metadata

Judgment