Remey Kesavan Dharmarajan Asari v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Thiruvannathapuram/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Trivandrum
[Citation -2020-LL-0303-37]
Citation | 2020-LL-0303-37 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Remey Kesavan Dharmarajan Asari |
Respondent Name | Income-tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Thiruvannathapuram/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Trivandrum |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 03/03/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | application for stay • demand notice • stay petition |
Bot Summary: | No.6412 OF 2020(B) 2 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that eventhough he preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay application against Ext.P1 assessment order dated 30.12.2019 raising a demand of Rs.47,58,218/-, during the interregnum, confronted with notices under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued by the 1 st respondent. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the action of the 1st respondent is illegal and arbitrary, since the appeal and stay petition preferred against Ext.P1 assessment order is still pending. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Income tax submitted that the appellate authority would consider the request of the petitioner on the basis of the time frame to be fixed by this Court. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, this writ petition is disposed with a direction WP(C). No.6412 OF 2020(B) 3 to the 2nd respondent to consider the application for stay regarding the demand raised, in view of the garnishee orders issued by the 1st respondent, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall also appear before the 1st respondent on 10.3.2020 and the 15 days period will be construed thereafter. Implementation of Ext.P4 garnishee notices issued is ordered to be kept in abeyance. |