Ekambaram Manonmani v. The CIT, Salem / The ITO, Ward-1(6), Salem / The Branch manger, Axis Bank / The Branch manger, Bank of Baroda
[Citation -2020-LL-0228-62]
Citation | 2020-LL-0228-62 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Ekambaram Manonmani |
Respondent Name | The CIT, Salem / The ITO, Ward-1(6), Salem / The Branch manger, Axis Bank / The Branch manger, Bank of Baroda |
Court | HIGH COURT OF MADRAS |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 28/02/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2019-20 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | recovery proceeding • statutory appeal • stay petition |
Bot Summary: | The petitioner has suffered an order of assessment dated 30.12.2019 for Assessment Year 2019-20 passed in terms of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On 04.02.2020, the petitioner has also filed a stay application before R1 which is also stated to be pending as on date. Even during the pendency of the aforesaid stay application, the impugned communication has been issued by the Assessing Officer/R2 treating the petitioner as assessee in default and calling upon the petitioner to remit the disputed taxes forthwith under threat of coercive action. I am of the view that such recovery proceeding are pre-mature, since the petitioner has admittedly filed an application seeking stay before the Appellate Commissioner and the Central Board of Direct Taxes has, in Instruction No. 1914 F. No. 404/72/93 ITCC dated 02.12.1993 directed the Appellate Commissioner to dispose the applications for stay filed by an assessee within a period of two weeks from date of filing of the same. The petitioner is permitted to appear before the Commissioner of Income Tax/R2 on Tuesday, the 09th March of 2020 at 10.30 a.m. without expecting any further notice in this regard. After hearing the petitioner and considering the stay application, an order shall be passed by R2, taking into consideration the three fold aspects of prima facie case, financial stringency and balance of convenience. In the event the petitioner does not appear on the aforesaid date of hearing, the impugned order will stand revived. |