The Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Chennai v. Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0219-107]

Citation 2020-LL-0219-107
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Chennai
Respondent Name Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/02/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: In Order in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 dated 19.02.2020JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J)These Tax Case Appeals have been filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Madras, by raising the following substantial questions of law:1. Whether under the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in recalling its earlierorder with a view to pass a fresh order re-adjudicating theissues in dispute on the basis of the miscellaneous petition forrectification filed by the assessee2. Whether under the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Appellate Tribunal was right in not appreciating therestricted scope of the powers conferred on the Tribunalu/s. 254(2) which are limited to rectification of mistakes apparentfrom record and which did not empower the Tribunal to re-examine and re-appraise the entire facts of the case andevidence already considered and also to call upon the assesseeto produce materials and submissions in support of the merits2. InOrder in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 dated 19.02.2020 stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed, keeping the substantial questions of law open, with a liberty to the Revenue to move an application to re-call in case the Revenue establish the revenue stakes to be more than Rs.1 Crore. V.K.,J.)(R.S.K.,J.) 19.02.2020 KST Note to Office: Copy of this order may be sent to both parties.


Order in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 (Commissioner of Wealth Tax -Vs- Rayala Corporation) dated 19.02.2020 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.02.2020 CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARTax Case (Appeal) No.196 to 208 of 2010 Commissioner of Wealth Tax Chennai Appellant in all appeals Vs. M/s.Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd., 144/7, Old Mahabalipuram Road Kottivakkam, Chennai 600 041 Respondent in all appeals Tax Case Appeal fileds under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against common order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai dated 05.12.2008 in M.P.Nos.118 to 130/2008 in WTA Nos. 32 to 44/Mds/2006. For Appellant: Mr.R.Hemalatha, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : M/s.Venkatnarayanan forSubbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan Page 1 of 4 http://www.judis.nic.in Order in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 (Commissioner ofWealth Tax -Vs- Rayala Corporation) dated 19.02.2020JUDGMENT(Judgment of Court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J)These Tax Case Appeals have been filed by Revenue calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Madras, by raising following substantial questions of law:"1.Whether under facts and in circumstances of thecase, Appellate Tribunal was justified in recalling its earlierorder with view to pass fresh order re-adjudicating theissues in dispute on basis of miscellaneous petition forrectification filed by assessee?2.Whether under facts and in circumstances of case,the Appellate Tribunal was right in not appreciating therestricted scope of powers conferred on Tribunalu/s.254(2) which are limited to rectification of mistakes apparentfrom record and which did not empower Tribunal to re-examine and re-appraise entire facts of case andevidence already considered and also to call upon assesseeto produce materials and submissions in support of merits?2. When matter was taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular instruction issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is Page 2 of 4 http://www.judis.nic.inOrder in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 (Commissioner of Wealth Tax -Vs- Rayala Corporation) dated 19.02.2020 stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).3. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed, keeping substantial questions of law open, with liberty to Revenue to move application to re-call in case Revenue establish revenue stakes to be more than Rs.1 Crore.(V.K.,J.)(R.S.K.,J.) 19.02.2020 KST Note to Office: Copy of this order may be sent to both parties. To Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench,Chennai. Page 3 of 4 http://www.judis.nic.inOrder in TC Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 (Commissioner of Wealth Tax -Vs- Rayala Corporation) dated 19.02.2020DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.ANDR.SURESH KUMAR, J. KSTT.C.(A) Nos.196 to 208 of 2010 19.02.2020 Page 4 of 4 http://www.judis.nic.in Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Chennai v. Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd
Report Error