Entertainment Society of Goa v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Panaji
[Citation -2020-LL-0204-5]

Citation 2020-LL-0204-5
Appellant Name Entertainment Society of Goa
Respondent Name Commissioner of Income-tax, Panaji
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/02/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: Coram:- M.S. SONAK SMT. M. S. JAWALKER, JJ. Date:- 4th February, 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the parties state that there is no objection for this Bench to take up this appeal. Heard Mr. Gaurang Panandiker for the appellant and Mr. 2 TXA No.15 of 2013 dtd. 04.02.2020 Tulajappa Kalburgi, learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the parties agree that the issue raised in this appeal is covered by the Judgment and Order just pronounced by us in Tax Appeal No.2 of 2013. Accordingly, for the reasons set out in our Judgment and Order while disposing Tax Appeal No.2 of 2013, we allow this appeal as well and set aside the impugned orders made by the CIT and ITAT and order the restoration of the registration of the appellant. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, there shall be no order as to costs.


1 TXA No.15 of 2013 dtd. 04.02.2020 Suchitra IN HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO.15 OF 2013 ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY OF GOA, Old GMC Complex, D.B. Marg, Campal, Panaji, Goa. Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa-403001. Respondents Mr. Gaurang D. Panandiker, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Tulajappa Kalburgi, Junior Standing Counsel for Respondents. Coram:- M.S. SONAK & SMT. M. S. JAWALKER, JJ. Date:- 4th February, 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per M. S. Sonak, J.) learned counsel for parties state that there is no objection for this Bench to take up this appeal. 2. Heard Mr. Gaurang Panandiker for appellant and Mr. 2 TXA No.15 of 2013 dtd. 04.02.2020 Tulajappa Kalburgi, learned Junior Standing Counsel for respondents. 3. learned counsel for parties agree that issue raised in this appeal is covered by Judgment and Order just pronounced by us in Tax Appeal No.2 of 2013. 4. Accordingly, for reasons set out in our Judgment and Order while disposing Tax Appeal No.2 of 2013, we allow this appeal as well and set aside impugned orders made by CIT and ITAT and order restoration of registration of appellant. 5. In facts and circumstances of present case, there shall be no order as to costs. SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, J. M. S. SONAK, J. ss Entertainment Society of Goa v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Panaji
Report Error