Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS)-1 v. Air India Charters Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0204-38]

Citation 2020-LL-0204-38
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS)-1
Respondent Name Air India Charters Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/02/2020
Assessment Year 2010-11
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags deduct tax at source • sale consideration • credit cards • brokerage or commission • non deduction of tds • air ticket
Bot Summary: Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel, revenue for the appellant and Mr. Ashok Pandit, learned counsel for the respondent - assessee. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is preferred by the revenue against the order dated 4.11.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai A Bench, Mumbai in Income Tax Appeal No. 1458/Mum/2015 for the assessment year 2010-11. The following two questions have been proposed as substantial questions of law:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the CIT(A) and holding that the amount retained by a bank / credit card agency out of the sale consideration through credit cards is not covered under the definition of commission or brokerage given in the Explanation to Section 194H of the Act and the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194H in respect of this amount Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the CIT(A) that there was lack of principal and agent relationship between the assessee and the bank / credit card agencies 4. Mr. Kumar, learned standing counsel fairly submits that this Court in CIT Vs. Jet Airways Ltd 1 has answered the two questions in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In the said decision, this Court vide affirming the similar findings returned by the Tribunal held that amount retained by a bank / credit card agency out of the sale consideration of tickets booked through credit cards is not covered under the definition of 'commission' or 'brokerage' 1 Income Tax Appeal No. 628 of 2018 decided on 23.4.2019 2 of 3 3. Os itxa 1491-17.doc given in explanation to Section 194H of the Act and in such circumstances, assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194H in respect of this amount. In the light of the above, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.


3. os itxa 1491-17.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1491 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 Appellant Versus M/s. Air India Charters Ltd Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Sumandevi Yadav for Appellant Mr. Ashok J. Pandit for Respondent CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2020. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel, revenue for appellant and Mr. Ashok Pandit, learned counsel for respondent - assessee. 2. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) is preferred by revenue against order dated 4.11.2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai "A" Bench, Mumbai ("Tribunal" for short) in Income Tax Appeal No. 1458/Mum/2015 for assessment year 2010-11. 1 of 3 3. os itxa 1491-17.doc 3. following two questions have been proposed as substantial questions of law:- (i) Whether on facts and in circumstances of case and in law, Tribunal was justified in upholding order of CIT(A) and holding that amount retained by bank / credit card agency out of sale consideration through credit cards is not covered under definition of "commission or brokerage" given in Explanation (i) to Section 194H of Act and assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194H in respect of this amount? (ii) Whether on facts and in circumstances of case and in law, Tribunal was justified in upholding order of CIT(A) that there was lack of principal and agent relationship between assessee and bank / credit card agencies? 4. Mr. Kumar, learned standing counsel fairly submits that this Court in CIT Vs. Jet Airways (India) Ltd 1 has answered two questions in favour of assessee and against revenue. In said decision, this Court vide affirming similar findings returned by Tribunal held that amount retained by bank / credit card agency out of sale consideration of tickets booked through credit cards is not covered under definition of 'commission' or 'brokerage' 1 Income Tax Appeal No. 628 of 2018 decided on 23.4.2019 2 of 3 3. os itxa 1491-17.doc given in explanation (i) to Section 194H of Act and in such circumstances, assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194H in respect of this amount. 5. In light of above, appeal filed by revenue is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to cost. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [UJJAL BHUYAN, J.] Digitally signed by Ravindra Ravindra M. Amberkar M. Date: Amberkar 2020.02.06 10:27:22 +0530 3 of 3 Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS)-1 v. Air India Charters Ltd
Report Error