8. os itxa 1599-17.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1599 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS-1, Mumbai Appellant Versus Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd Respondent Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for Appellant Mr. Bharat Damodar i/by Kanga & Co for Respondent CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2020. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) is preferred by revenue against order dated 7.9.2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai "H" Bench, Mumbai ("Tribunal" for short) in Income Tax Appeal No. 3512/Mum/2014 for assessment year 2002-03. 3. Mr. Chhotaray, learned standing counsel, revenue for 1 of 2 8. os itxa 1599-17.doc appellant fairly submits that disputed tax effect in this appeal is Rs. 51,29,096.00 which is below enhanced prescribed limit for filing of appeal before High Court in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019. 4. In that view of matter, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Court fees paid to be refunded as per rules. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [UJJAL BHUYAN, J.] Digitally signed by Ravindra M. Ravindra Amberkar M. Date: 2020.02.06 Amberkar 10:29:33 +0530 2 of 2 Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd