Arun Trehan through LR Mamta Trehan v. The ACIT, Circle-5(1), Chandigarh - 2020-LL-0128-69

Citation	2020-LL-0128-69
Appellant Name	Arun Trehan through LR Mamta Trehan
Respondent Name	The ACIT, Circle-5(1), Chandigarh
Court	HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	28/01/2020
Assessment Year	2011-12
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 11.10.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh in ITA No.46/Chd/2018 for the aassessment year 2011-12. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla Versus M/s Aarham Softronics; 2019 TMI, 1285. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.01.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh ITA No.199 of 2019 -2- above factual submission. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of on the same terms of the above referred judgment. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.01.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh.

ITA No.199 of 2019 -1- 218 IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.199 of 2019 Date of Decision: 28.01.2020 Arun Trehan through LR Mamta Trehan Appellant Versus ACIT, Circle 5(1), Chandigarh Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral): 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 11.10.2018 (Annexure A-5) passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh in ITA No.46/Chd/2018 for aassessment year 2011-12. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that issue involved in present appeal is covered by judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla Versus M/s Aarham Softronics; 2019 (2) TMI, 1285. 3. Learned counsel for respondent does not dispute PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.01.29 14:06 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh ITA No.199 of 2019 -2- above factual submission. 4. In view of above, present appeal is disposed of on same terms of above referred judgment. [AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE January 28, 2020 pankaj baweja 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.01.29 14:06 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh Arun Trehan through LR Mamta Trehan v. ACIT, Circle-5(1), Chandigarh

Metadata

Judgment