The Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore / The Joint Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore v. Vijaya Bank
[Citation -2020-LL-0122-99]

Citation 2020-LL-0122-99
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore / The Joint Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore
Respondent Name Vijaya Bank
Court HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 22/01/2020
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags minimum alternate tax
Bot Summary: K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. T Suryanarayana, learned Counsel for the respondent. This appeal, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed by the revenue which was admitted by a Bench of this Court by order dated 9.11.2018 on the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon ble Tribunal was right in law in holding that Banking companies are not liable for Minimum Alternate Tax under Section 115JB of the Act against the provisions of the Act 3 2. It is a common ground that the aforesaid substantial question of law is answered by us vide judgment dated 16.01.2020 passed in ITA No.18/2014. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of by answering the substantial question of law framed in this appeal in terms of the judgment dated 16.1.2020 passed in ITA No.18/2014.


IN HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2020 PRESENT HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI ITA No.142/2016 BETWEEN: 1. Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU JSS Tower s BSK III Stage, Bangalore 560 085 2. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU JSS Tower s BSK III Stage, Bangalore 560 085 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE ) AND: M/s Vijaya Bank, Ho: Central Accounts Dept. 41/2, M.G.Road, Bangalore,- 560 001 PAN: AAACV 4791J RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.09.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.660/BANG/2010,FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for revenue. Sri. T Suryanarayana, learned Counsel for respondent. This appeal, under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act for short) has been filed by revenue which was admitted by Bench of this Court by order dated 9.11.2018 on following substantial question of law: Whether on facts and circumstances of case, Hon ble Tribunal was right in law in holding that Banking companies are not liable for Minimum Alternate Tax under Section 115JB of Act against provisions of Act? 3 2. It is common ground that aforesaid substantial question of law is answered by us vide judgment dated 16.01.2020 passed in ITA No.18/2014. In view of aforesaid submissions, appeal is disposed of by answering substantial question of law framed in this appeal in terms of judgment dated 16.1.2020 passed in ITA No.18/2014. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Psg Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax LTU, Bangalore v. Vijaya Bank
Report Error