The Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nagpur Infotech Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0120-41]

Citation 2020-LL-0120-41
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Nagpur Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/01/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: In all these matters, the tax effect involved is less than the threshold limit of.1.00 crore as provided in the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019. In view of this, the matters are required to be withdrawn by the appellant/ Department. Till this date, no instructions are received by the learned counsel for the appellant in all these matters. Uploaded on - 22/01/2020 Downloaded on - 25/01/2020 09:32:27 it28.15 other matters. Odt 2/2 We dispose of all these matters as withdrawn in view of CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019 and direct the refund of court- fees as is permissible in law. If the department finds that the matter is not covered by the Circular, it shall be permissible for the appellant to file appropriate application for restoration of the matter, within a period of one month from today. If such application is not preferred during this period, costs of.1,000/- will have to be deposited.


it28.15+other matters.odt 1/2 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 28 OF 2015 (The Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. M/s. Nagpur Infotech Pvt. Ltd.) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2015 (The Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. M/s. Glycosis Merchants Pvt. Ltd.) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2018 (The Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. M/s. R.B.Seth Shreeram Narsingdas) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2018 (The Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. M/s. R.B.Seth Shreeram Narsingdas) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2018 (The Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. M/s. R.B.Seth Shreeram Narsingdas) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2018 (The Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax vrs. Shri Suresdh Kisanlalji Sancheti) Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Petitioner in all matters Shri Manoj Moriyani, Advocate for Respdt in IT No.28/2015 Shri Rachit Thakar with Sanjay Thakar, Advocate for Respdt in I.T.No. 64/2018 CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATE: 20th JANUARY, 2020. In all these matters, tax effect involved is less than threshold limit of .1.00 crore as provided in CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019. In view of this, matters are required to be withdrawn by appellant/ Department. However, till this date, no instructions are received by learned counsel for appellant in all these matters. Uploaded on - 22/01/2020 Downloaded on - 25/01/2020 09:32:27 it28.15+other matters.odt 2/2 We, therefore, dispose of all these matters as withdrawn in view of CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019 and direct refund of court- fees as is permissible in law. If department finds that matter is not covered by Circular, it shall be permissible for appellant to file appropriate application for restoration of matter, within period of one month from today. If such application is not preferred during this period, costs of .1,000/- will have to be deposited. appeals stand disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit Uploaded on - 22/01/2020 Downloaded on - 25/01/2020 09:32:27 Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nagpur Infotech Pvt. Ltd
Report Error