The Vengeri Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Kozhikode / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode
[Citation -2019-LL-1218-76]

Citation 2019-LL-1218-76
Appellant Name The Vengeri Service Co-Operative Bank Limited
Respondent Name Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Kozhikode / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 18/12/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags disputed amount • penalty order • stay petition • time limit • interim order
Bot Summary: No.34728/2019 :: 2 :: JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 and P4 appeals together with Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions before the 3 rd respondent. It is stated that while the stay petitions are pending consideration before the 3rd respondent/Appellate Authority, by Ext.P7 order issued under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has been directed to pay 20 of the disputed amount pending disposal of the appeals. Taking cue from the said judgment, I dispose the writ petition by directing the 3 rd respondent/Appellate Authority to consider and pass reasoned orders on Exts.P3 and P4 appeals within an outer time limit of six months from the date of W.P.(C). No.34728/2019 :: 3 :: receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 3 rd respondent, as directed, and the order communicated to the petitioner. In the light of the directions above, Ext.P7 order impugned in the writ petition is set aside. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 3 rd respondent, for further action.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 W.P(C).No.34728 OF 2019(M) PETITIONER: VENGERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,NO.2714 REP BY ITS SECRETARY, VENGERI P.O, KOZHIKODE 673 010. BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.P.C.GOPINATH SMT.BINDU SREEDHAR SHRI.ASIF N RESPONDENTS: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE 673 001. 2 JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, OFFICE OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RANGE-2, KOZHIKODE 673 001. 3 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE 673 001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2019, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.34728/2019 :: 2 :: JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders under Income Tax Act, petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 and P4 appeals together with Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions before 3 rd respondent. It is stated that while stay petitions are pending consideration before 3rd respondent/Appellate Authority, by Ext.P7 order issued under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, petitioner has been directed to pay 20% of disputed amount pending disposal of appeals. learned counsel for petitioner refers to Ext.P8 judgment of this Court, where, under similar circumstances, this Court had directed Appellate Authority to consider and pass orders in appeal and kept recovery proceedings in abeyance till such time as Appellate Authority decided appeal. Taking cue from said judgment, I dispose writ petition by directing 3 rd respondent/Appellate Authority to consider and pass reasoned orders on Exts.P3 and P4 appeals within outer time limit of six months from date of W.P.(C).No.34728/2019 :: 3 :: receipt of copy of this judgment, after hearing petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner by Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by 3 rd respondent, as directed, and order communicated to petitioner. In light of directions above, Ext.P7 order impugned in writ petition is set aside. petitioner shall produce copy of writ petition together with copy of this judgment, before 3 rd respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/18/12/19 W.P.(C).No.34728/2019 :: 4 :: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF PENALTY ORDER DATED 05-08-2019 BY 2ND RESPONDENT US 27ID IT ACT EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF PENALTY ORDER DATED 05-08-2019 BY 2ND RESPONDENT US 271E IT ACT EXHIBIT P3 PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL AGAINST SECTION 27ID PENDING BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL AGAINST SECTION 27IE PENDING BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION AGAINST EXT P1 BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22-10-2019. EXHIBIT P6 PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION AGAINST EXT P2 BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22-10-2019. EXHIBIT P7 PHOTOCOPY OF INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN STAY PETITION DATED 13/12/2019. EXHIBIT P8 PHOTOCOPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT IN WPC 6907 OF 2019 AND OTHER CONNECTED MATTERS DATED 11-10-2019 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Vengeri Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Kozhikode / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode
Report Error