The Vengeri Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Kozhikode / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode
[Citation -2019-LL-1218-76]
Citation | 2019-LL-1218-76 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Vengeri Service Co-Operative Bank Limited |
Respondent Name | Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode / Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Kozhikode / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kozhikode |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 18/12/2019 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | disputed amount • penalty order • stay petition • time limit • interim order |
Bot Summary: | No.34728/2019 :: 2 :: JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 and P4 appeals together with Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions before the 3 rd respondent. It is stated that while the stay petitions are pending consideration before the 3rd respondent/Appellate Authority, by Ext.P7 order issued under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has been directed to pay 20 of the disputed amount pending disposal of the appeals. Taking cue from the said judgment, I dispose the writ petition by directing the 3 rd respondent/Appellate Authority to consider and pass reasoned orders on Exts.P3 and P4 appeals within an outer time limit of six months from the date of W.P.(C). No.34728/2019 :: 3 :: receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Exts.P1 and P2 penalty orders shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 3 rd respondent, as directed, and the order communicated to the petitioner. In the light of the directions above, Ext.P7 order impugned in the writ petition is set aside. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 3 rd respondent, for further action. |