Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Ashok Leyland Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-1217-79]

Citation 2019-LL-1217-79
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai
Respondent Name Ashok Leyland Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/12/2019
Assessment Year 1992-93
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect • penalty
Bot Summary: Nos.242 and 243 of 2014 CIT vs. M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd. 2/4 COMMON JUDGMENT This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 1 March 2012, in I.T.A.Nos. 1917,1918/Mds/2010, for the Assessment Year 1992-93 and 1993-94, by raising the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Senior Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeals filed by the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.12.2019 CORAM HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.242 and 243 of 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai ... Appellant Vs. M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd., Sardar Patel Road, Chennai 32. ... Respondent Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 1.3.2012 made in ITA Nos.1917, 1918/Mds/2010. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt.17.12.2019 in T.C.(A).Nos.242 and 243 of 2014 CIT vs. M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd. 2/4 COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by Revenue, calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 1 March 2012, in I.T.A.Nos.1917,1918/Mds/2010, for Assessment Year 1992-93 and 1993-94, by raising following substantial question of law: "Whether on facts and circumstances of case, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act?" 2. When matter is taken up for hearing, learned Senior Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular instruction issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt.17.12.2019 in T.C.(A).Nos.242 and 243 of 2014 CIT vs. M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd. 3/4 3. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, Appeals filed by Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. Consequently, M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2014 are also dismissed. (V.K.,J.) (R.S.K.,J.) 17.12.2019 Index : Yes/No tar To 1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in Judgt. dt.17.12.2019 in T.C.(A).Nos.242 and 243 of 2014 CIT vs. M/s.Ashok Leyland Ltd. 4/4 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. and R.SURESH KUMAR, J. (tar) T.C.(A) Nos.242 & 243/2014 17.12.2019 Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Ashok Leyland Ltd
Report Error