IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1612-1613 OF 2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI CITY 11 Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ZEE TELEFILMS LTD. Respondent(s) ORDER Heard learned counsel for appellant. appeals arise from judgment of High Court rejecting appeal(s) on ground of unexplained delay of nine months. We have perused application for condonation of delay filed before High Court. reasons stated therein to say least are preposterous. High Court justly rejected application for condonation of delay on ground of unexplained delay. Hence, no interference is warranted. appeals are dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ...................J (A.M. KHANWILKAR) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2019.10.24 17:29:10 IST Reason: ...................J (DINESH MAHESHWARI) New Delhi October 23, 2019 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1612-1613/2009 C.I.T, MUMBAI CITY 11 Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ZEE TELEFILMS P. LTD. THR. ITS MANAGER Respondent(s) ([ AT TOP ] ) Date : 23-10-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Appellant(s) Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, ASG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai City-11 v. Zee Telefilms Ltd