Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ameya Logistics Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-1014-84]

Citation 2019-LL-1014-84
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Ameya Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 14/10/2019
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags infrastructure facility
Bot Summary: This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 challenges the order dated 4 th August, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the Revenue urges the following question of law for our consideration :- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though activities undertaken by the assessee do not fall within Clause of the Explanation to section 80IA(4) defining the term Infrastructure facility 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 17:20:16 ::: Uday S. Jagtap 940-17-ITXA-97.doc 3. It is an undisputed position that the issue herein stands concluded against the Revenue and in favour of the Respondent- assessee by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax- II, Thane Vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation Ltd. 68 taxmann.com 78 and by Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd. 404 ITR 397. In the above view, the question as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law.


Uday S. Jagtap 940-17-ITXA-97=.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 940 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant v/s. M/s. Ameya Logistics Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant None for respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J. DATED : 14 th OCTOBER, 2019 P.C. 1. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act,1961 (Act) challenges order dated 4 th August, 2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (Tribunal). This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for Revenue urges following question of law for our consideration :- Whether on facts and in circumstances of case and in law, Tribunal was right in holding that assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80IA of Income Tax Act, 1961 even though activities undertaken by assessee do not fall within Clause (d) of Explanation to section 80IA(4) defining term Infrastructure facility ? 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 17:20:16 ::: Uday S. Jagtap 940-17-ITXA-97=.doc 3. It is undisputed position that issue herein stands concluded against Revenue and in favour of Respondent- assessee by decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax- II, Thane Vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. (2015) 68 taxmann.com 78 (Bom) and by Apex Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd. (2018) 404 ITR 397. 4. In above view, question as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus not entertained. 5. Appeal dismissed. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 17:20:16 ::: Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Ameya Logistics Pvt. Ltd
Report Error