Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur v. Modern Threads (India) Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-1004-78]
Citation | 2019-LL-1004-78 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur |
Respondent Name | Modern Threads (India) Ltd. |
Court | HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 04/10/2019 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | remission of principal amount |
Bot Summary: | The appeal nos.266/18 and 267/18 have been filed by assessee against the judgement of the Tribunal, which remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) by relying on certain judgements, whereas CIT(A) on consideration of the judgement of this Court in ITA-285/2018 the own case of the assesee dated 26.4.2017 deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer treating the remission of liability on account of waiver from bank/financial institutions and adding the same back to the total income of the assessee. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the substantial questions of law involved in this matter are squarely covered by the judgement of this Court in Modern Demin Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of I.T., Jaipur, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.145/2010 and other 4 connected matters dated 26.4.2017 where the substantial question of law was whether the remission of principal amount of loan obtained from financial institutions and banks constitutes a benefit or pre-requisite arising from business and would fall within the ambit of Section 28(iv) of the Act. This Court in the aforesaid judgement while allowing the appeals filed by the assessee reversed the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and restored the view taken by the CIT(A) following the judgement of Bombay High Court in Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.- 261 ITR 501, which held that income which can be taxed under Section 28(iv) must not only be referable to a benefit or perquisite, but it must be arising from business and that Section 28(iv) does not apply to benefits in cash or money. It is also not disputed that judgement of the Bombay High Court was upheld by the Supreme Court by dismissing the Civil Appeal No.6949-6950 of 2004, the Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. through M.D. and other connected appeals by judgement dated 24.4.2018. Even the SLPs filed against the judgement of this Court in M/s. Modern Threads Ltd., supra ITA-285/2018 were also disposed of in view of judgement of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., supra dated 24.4.2018. 266/18 and 267/18 preferred by the assessee are allowed, the appeal nos.270/18, 285/18, 286/18 and 295/18 filed by the revenue are dismissed. Office to place a copy of this order in each connected matter. |