Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle–7(1)(2), Mumbai v. Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0925-14]

Citation 2019-LL-0925-14
Appellant Name Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle–7(1)(2), Mumbai
Respondent Name Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd.
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/09/2019
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags low tax effect
Bot Summary: At the outset, learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the tax effect on the additions contested by the Revenue is less than 2 Hindustan Polyamides Fibres Ltd. the prescribed limit of 50 lakh fixed for filing of appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is covered by the recently issued low tax effect Circular no.17/2019, dated 8th August 2019, r/w Circular no.3/2018, dated 11th July 2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. We find that the tax effect on the quantum of additions disputed by the Revenue in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of 50 lakh. The Revenue has not brought any material before us to show that its appeal is protected by any of the exceptions provided in the aforesaid circulars. The appeal filed by the Revenue has to be withdrawn/not pressed, since the aforesaid Circulars issued by CBDT apply even to the pending appeals. In view of the aforesaid, we dismiss the present appeal filed by the Revenue. It is made clear, if at a later point the Revenue finds that its appeal is protected by any of the exceptions provided in the circulars referred to above, it will be at liberty to seek recall of this order and adjudication of the appeal on merits.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL H BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA no.3958/Mum./2018 (Assessment Year 2006 07) Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax . Appellant Circle 7(1)(2), Mumbai v/s Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd. 1004, Peninsula Towers G.K. Marg, Lower Parel . Respondent Mumbai 400 013 PAN AAACH3757J Assessee by Shri K. Gopal Revenue by Shri M. Rajan Date of Hearing 11.09.2019 Date of Order 25.09.2019 ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. present appeal, preferred by Revenue, is directed against order dated 16th March 2018, passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 12, Mumbai, pertaining to assessment year 2006 07. 2. At outset, learned Counsel for assessee submitted that tax effect on additions contested by Revenue is less than 2 Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd. prescribed limit of ` 50 lakh fixed for filing of appeal before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, hence, is covered by recently issued low tax effect Circular no.17/2019, dated 8th August 2019, r/w Circular no.3/2018, dated 11th July 2018, issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes. Therefore, appeal filed by Revenue is not maintainable. 3. learned Departmental Representative fairly agreed with aforesaid submissions of learned Authorised Representative. 4. We have perused material on record and gone through CBDT Circulars referred to above. We find that tax effect on quantum of additions disputed by Revenue in present appeal is below threshold limit of ` 50 lakh. Revenue has not brought any material before us to show that its appeal is protected by any of exceptions provided in aforesaid circulars. Therefore, appeal filed by Revenue has to be withdrawn/not pressed, since aforesaid Circulars issued by CBDT apply even to pending appeals. In view of aforesaid, we dismiss present appeal filed by Revenue. However, it is made clear, if at later point Revenue finds that its appeal is protected by any of exceptions provided in circulars referred to above, it will be at liberty to seek recall of this order and adjudication of appeal on merits. 3 Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd. 2. In result, Revenue s appeal stands dismissed. Order pronounced in open Court on 25.09.2019 Sd/- Sd/- SHAMIM YAHYA SAKTIJIT DEY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 25.09.2019 Copy of order forwarded to (1) Assessee; (2) Revenue; (3) CIT(A) (4) CIT, Mumbai City concerned (5) DR, ITAT, Mumbai; (6) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Assistant Registrar ITAT, Mumbai Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle7(1)(2), Mumbai v. Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd
Report Error