The Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-II v. Labh Construction & Industries Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0920-25]

Citation 2019-LL-0920-25
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-II
Respondent Name Labh Construction & Industries Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/09/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: Heard Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant and Mr. B.S. Soparkar, learned advocate for the respondent. Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, has stated that the tax effect involved in these appeals is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/. Under the circumstances, in the light of the Circular No.23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which provides that no appeal wherein the tax effect does not Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Tue Sep 24 12:46:49 IST 2019 C/TAXAP/1198/2007 ORDER exceed the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/ shall be filed before the High Court and which has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeals. The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed in light of the Circular dated 06.09.2019. In case there is any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if, for any reason, the Circular is not applicable, it would be open for the appellant to seek revival of the appeal/s.


IN HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1198 of 2007 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1199 of 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD - II Versus LABH CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIESLTD. Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for Appellant(s) No. 1 MR BS SOPARKAR FOR MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for Opponent(s) No. 1 CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 20/09/2019 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1. Heard Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for appellant and Mr. B.S. Soparkar, learned advocate for respondent. 2. Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for appellant, has stated that tax effect involved in these appeals is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/ . Under circumstances, in light of Circular No.23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which provides that no appeal wherein tax effect does not Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Tue Sep 24 12:46:49 IST 2019 C/TAXAP/1198/2007 ORDER exceed monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/ shall be filed before High Court and which has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, learned senior standing counsel for appellant does not press present appeals. 3. appeals are, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed in light of Circular dated 06.09.2019. However, in case there is any error in computation of tax effect involved or if, for any reason, Circular is not applicable, it would be open for appellant to seek revival of appeal/s. (HARSHA DEVANI, J) (SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) PRAVIN KARUNAN Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Tue Sep 24 12:46:49 IST 2019 Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-II v. Labh Construction & Industries Ltd
Report Error