The Income-tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(2), Bengaluru v. Anil Gowda - 2019-LL-0919-3

Citation	2019-LL-0919-3
Appellant Name	The Income-tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(2), Bengaluru
Respondent Name	Anil Gowda
Court	ITAT-Bangalore
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	19/09/2019
Assessment Year	2014-15
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	grant relief • typographical error
Bot Summary:	In view of the above, the penultimate sentence of paragraph 24 of the order dated 10-01-2019 passed by the Tribunal in ITA No.1316/Bang/2018 is substituted by the following sentence:- Thus, assessee gets relief of Rs.14,66,327/-. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the dictating Member. Date on which the approved draft comes to Sr.P.S. 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the dictating Member 5. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. P.S. 6. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order. The date on which the file goes to dispatch section for dispatch of the Tribunal Order.

IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC B BENCH BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI B.R BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MP No.73/Bang/2019 (In ITA No.1316/Bang/2018) Assessment year 2014-15 Income-tax Officer, Vs. Sri Anil Gowda, Ward-5(3)(2), No.325/1, 5th Cross, Bengaluru. RMV Extension, Sadashivnagar, Bengaluru-560 080. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Ganesh Chohagle, Standing Counsel for Dept. Respondent by : Shri S.V Ravishankar, Advocate Date of hearing 06.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement 19.09.2019 ORDER PerB.R Baskaran,Accountant Member revenue has filed this miscellaneous application pointing out that relief granted by Tribunal has been wrongly mentioned as Rs.1,46,66,327/- instead of Rs.14,66,327/- in paragraph 24 of order passed by Tribunal. 2. I heard parties in this regard. Ld A.R submitted that he does not have any objection to prayer made in petition filed by revenue and further submitted that error pointed out by revenue was only typographical error. MP No.73/Bang/2019 Page 2 of 3 3. In view of above, penultimate sentence of paragraph 24 of order dated 10-01-2019 passed by Tribunal in ITA No.1316/Bang/2018 is substituted by following sentence:- Thus, assessee gets relief of Rs.14,66,327/-. I order accordingly. 4. In result, miscellaneous application of Revenue is allowed. Order pronounced in Open Court on 19th September, 2019. Sd/- (B.R Baskaran) Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated, 19th September, 2019. Copy to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file By order Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore. MP No.73/Bang/2019 Page 3 of 3 1. Date of Dictation 2. Date on which typed draft is placed before dictating Member . 3. Date on which approved draft comes to Sr.P.S . 4. Date on which fair order is placed before dictating Member 5. Date on which fair order comes back to Sr. P.S. 6. Date of uploading order on website .7. If not uploaded, furnish reason for doing so Dictation note enclosed . 8. Date on which file goes to Bench Clerk 9. Date on which order goes for Xerox & endorsement 10. Date on which file goes to Head Clerk . 11. date on which file goes to Assistant Registrar for signature on order . 12. date on which file goes to dispatch section for dispatch of Tribunal Order . Income-tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(2), Bengaluru v. Anil Gowda

Metadata

Judgment