Arti Bhartia v. ITO, Ward-32(3), Kolkata
[Citation -2019-LL-0917-79]
| Citation | 2019-LL-0917-79 |
|---|---|
| Appellant Name | Arti Bhartia |
| Respondent Name | ITO, Ward-32(3), Kolkata |
| Court | ITAT-Kolkata |
| Relevant Act | Income-tax |
| Date of Order | 17/09/2019 |
| Assessment Year | 2015-16 |
| Judgment | View Judgment |
| Keyword Tags | unexplained cash credit • capital gain • ex-parte order • claim of exemption • disallowance of exemption • sale proceeds of share • restoration of appeal • non-appearance |
| Bot Summary: | Date of concluding the hearing September 17, 2019 Date of pronouncing the order September 17, 2019 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) 9, Kolkata dated 28.03.2019 passed ex-parte dismissing the appeal of the assessee non-prosecution. In the assessment completed u/s 143(3) vide an order dated 15.12.2017, the total income of the assessee was determined by the AO at Rs. 22,37,930/- after disallowing the assessee s claim for exemption of Long Term Capital Gain arising from the sale of shares of CCL International Ltd. and treating the entire sale proceeds of such sale as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. Against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) and since there was 2 I.T.A. No. 828/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Arti Bhartia no compliance on the part of the assessee to the notices issued by him fixing the said appeal for hearing from time to time, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee vide his appellate order dated 28.03.2019 passed ex-parte. The learned counsel for the assessee has submitted that even though none appeared on behalf of the assessee for hearing before the Ld. CIT(A) on the given dates, a detailed written submission was filed in support of the assessee s case on the issue raised in the appeal. The learned DR, on the other hand, has submitted that if the written submission filed by the assessee as claimed by the learned counsel for the assessee was not considered by the Ld. CIT(A), the matter may be sent back to the Ld. CIT(A) for deciding the same afresh after taking into consideration the said submission. Keeping in view all the facts of the case, I find merit in this contention raised by the learned DR. The impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is accordingly set aside and the matter is remitted back to him for disposing the appeal of the assessee afresh on merit in accordance with law after considering the written submission filed by the assessee and after giving the assessee one more opportunity of being heard. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose. |