DCIT, Circle-4(1), New Delhi v. Bausch & Lomb India Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0913-63]

Citation 2019-LL-0913-63
Appellant Name DCIT, Circle-4(1), New Delhi
Respondent Name Bausch & Lomb India Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/09/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ITA 832/2019 The present appeal is directed against the order dated 25.02.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.7808/Del/2018 for the assessment year 2014-15. The Tribunal has based its decision on the decision of this Court in the in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2006- 07, 2007-08, 2008- 09 2009-10 reported as 381 ITR 227 as well as in Assessment Year 2012-13 decided by the Tribunal itself. Since this Court has already rendered its decision on the issues raised by the appellant in respect of earlier assessment years relating to the respondent, we are not inclined to entertain the present appeal.


$ 53. * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 832/2019 DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1) NEW DELHI Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma and Ms. Adeeba Mujahid, Advocates. versus BAUSCH & LOMB INDIA PVT LTD. Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 13.09.2019 C.M. No. 40974/2019 Delay in filing is condoned. application stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. ITA 832/2019 present appeal is directed against order dated 25.02.2019 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.7808/Del/2018 for assessment year 2014-15. Tribunal has based its decision on decision of this Court in in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2006- 07, 2007-08, 2008- 09 & 2009-10 reported as (2016) 381 ITR 227 as well as in Assessment Year 2012-13 decided by Tribunal itself. Since this Court has already rendered its decision on issues raised by appellant in respect of earlier assessment years relating to respondent, we are not inclined to entertain present appeal. Dismissed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 kd DCIT, Circle-4(1), New Delhi v. Bausch & Lomb India Pvt. Ltd
Report Error