V Mohan v. The Income-tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Bangalore
[Citation -2019-LL-0904-94]

Citation 2019-LL-0904-94
Appellant Name V Mohan
Respondent Name The Income-tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Bangalore
Court ITAT-Bangalore
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/09/2019
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags dismissing the appeal in limine • reasonable cause • non-appearance • ex-parte order • delay in filing appeal • condonation of delay • cash deposit
Bot Summary: The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of the ld CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal in limine, without deciding the issues on merits. The assessee has moved a petition and, in the said petition, it is sated that the wife of the assessee was suffering kidney related disease and due to her hospitalization, the assessee could not attend to income-tax related works. Having regard to the submissions made in the Affidavit filed in the assessee, we are of the view that there is reasonable cause for the assessee in filing the appeal belatedly before the Tribunal. From the petition filed by the assessee requesting the Bench to condone the delay, we notice that the assessee was busy in attending his ailing wife and hence the same may be the reason for his non-appearance before Ld CIT(A). ITA No.2014/Bang/2018 Page 3 of 4 Accordingly, we are of the view that, in the interest of natural justice, the assessee should be provided with one more opportunity to present his case before Ld CIT(A). After affording adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, the Ld CIT(A) may take appropriate decision in accordance with law. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDNET AND SHRI B.R BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2014/Bang/2018 Assessment year : 2005-06 Shri V Mohan, Vs. Income-tax Officer, Sri Datta Nilaya Bileshvale, Ward-6(2), Hanumantha Nagar, Bangalore. Doddagubbi Post, Bangalore East-562 149. PAN - AMVPM 7937 R. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : None Respondent by : Dr. P.V Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of hearing : 03.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 04.09.2019 ORDER Per B.R Baskaran, Accountant Member assessee has filed this appeal challenging order dated 29/1/2019 passed by ld CIT(A)-IV, Bangalore and it relates to asst. year 2005-06. 2. assessee is aggrieved by decision of ld CIT(A) in dismissing appeal in limine, without deciding issues on merits. ITA No.2014/Bang/2018 Page 2 of 4 3. None appeared on behalf of assessee. We also noticed that ld CIT(A) was also constrained to pass order ex-parte, as assessee was not present before him. 4. We noticed that appeal filed by assessee before Tribunal is barred by limitation by 37 days. assessee has moved petition and, in said petition, it is sated that wife of assessee was suffering kidney related disease and due to her hospitalization, assessee could not attend to income-tax related works. 5. We heard ld DR on this preliminary issue. 6. Having regard to submissions made in Affidavit filed in assessee, we are of view that there is reasonable cause for assessee in filing appeal belatedly before Tribunal. Accordingly we condone delay in filing appeal and admit it for hearing. 7. We heard ld DR and perused record. We noticed that issue contested by assessee was related to deposit of Rs.10.36 lakhs made by assessee by way of cash in his bank account maintained with Canara Bank. We noticed that ld CIT(A) has not adjudicated issue on merits since assessee did not appear before him. From petition filed by assessee requesting Bench to condone delay, we notice that assessee was busy in attending his ailing wife and hence same may be reason for his non-appearance before Ld CIT(A). ITA No.2014/Bang/2018 Page 3 of 4 Accordingly, we are of view that, in interest of natural justice, assessee should be provided with one more opportunity to present his case before Ld CIT(A). Accordingly, we set aside order passed by ld CIT(A) and restore all issues to his file for adjudicating them on merits. After affording adequate opportunity of being heard to assessee, Ld CIT(A) may take appropriate decision in accordance with law. We also direct assessee to cooperate with ld CIT(A) for expeditious disposal of appeal. 8. In result, appeal filed by assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in Open Court on 4th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (N.V Vasudevan) (B.R Baskaran) Vice President Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated, 4th September, 2019. / vms / Copy to: 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3 . CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file By order Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore. V Mohan v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-6(2), Bangalore
Report Error