ACIT, Circle-51(1), New Delhi v. Nalini Jewellers
[Citation -2019-LL-0902-43]

Citation 2019-LL-0902-43
Appellant Name ACIT, Circle-51(1), New Delhi
Respondent Name Nalini Jewellers
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 02/09/2019
Assessment Year 2012-13
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags opportunity of being heard to the assessee • proportionate interest • business of trading • speculative profit • foreign currency • forward contract • interest free advance • disallowance of expenses • disallowance of depreciation • notional interest
Bot Summary: It filed its return of income on 19th July, 2012 declaring total income of Rs.1,34,82,202/- The Assessing Officer completed the assessment u/s 143(3) on 5th March, 2015 determining the total income at Rs.2,92,31,520/- wherein he made the following additions:- ITA No.2395/Del/2016 i) Rs.1,54,29,231/- on account of gain on account of forward contracts in respect of foreign currency being speculative profits; ii) Rs.1,72,524/- being proportionate interest on account of interest free advances given; iii) Rs.80,205/- on account of disallowance of various expenses; and iv) Rs.67,364/- on account of disallowance of depreciation. Aggrieved with such part relief granted by the CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal challenging the deletion of Rs.1,72,524/- and holding that the gain of Rs.1,54,29,231/- derived on account of forward contracts in respect of foreign currency being speculative profit can be set off against the loss of Rs.62,94,000/- debited in gold desk account. Shri Nikhil Jain, Partner of the assessee firm appeared in person and submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Tribunal for assessment year 2010-11 have been set aside by the Hon'ble High Court to the file of the Assessing Officer. The appeal of the assessee for the impugned assessment year has been restored by the Tribunal to the file of the Assessing Officer with certain 2 ITA No.2395/Del/2016 directions. DR has no objection for restoring the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in the light of the direction of the Tribunal. In view of the consent by both the sides that the matter should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble High Court in assessee s own case for assessment year 2010-11, we restore both the issues raised by the Revenue in the grounds of appeal to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Needless to say, the Assessing Officer shall give due opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue as per fact and law.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2395/Del/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 ACIT, Vs Nalini Jewellers, Circle-51(1), 16/2646-49, Bank Street, New Delhi. Karol Bagh, New Delhi. PAN: AAEFN2292D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Jain, Partner Revenue by : Ms Ashima Neb, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 22.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 02.09.2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by Revenue is directed against order dated 24th February, 2016 of CIT(A)-17, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2012-13. 2. Facts of case, in brief, are that assessee is partnership firm engaged in business of trading and manufacturing of gold and diamond jewellery. It filed its return of income on 19th July, 2012 declaring total income of Rs.1,34,82,202/- Assessing Officer completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 5th March, 2015 determining total income at Rs.2,92,31,520/- wherein he made following additions:- ITA No.2395/Del/2016 i) Rs.1,54,29,231/- on account of gain on account of forward contracts in respect of foreign currency being speculative profits; ii) Rs.1,72,524/- being proportionate interest on account of interest free advances given; iii) Rs.80,205/- on account of disallowance of various expenses; and iv) Rs.67,364/- on account of disallowance of depreciation. 3. In appeal, ld.CIT(A) held that gain of Rs.1,54,29,231/- derived on account of forward contracts in respect of foreign currency being speculative profit can be set off against loss of Rs.62,94,000/- debited in gold desk account. He also deleted addition of Rs.1,72,524/- made by Assessing Officer on account of notional interest. He, however, sustained two other additions made by Assessing Officer. Aggrieved with such part relief granted by CIT(A), Revenue is in appeal before Tribunal challenging deletion of Rs.1,72,524/- and holding that gain of Rs.1,54,29,231/- derived on account of forward contracts in respect of foreign currency being speculative profit can be set off against loss of Rs.62,94,000/- debited in gold desk account. 4. Shri Nikhil Jain, Partner of assessee firm appeared in person and submitted that appeal filed by assessee against order of Tribunal for assessment year 2010-11 have been set aside by Hon'ble High Court to file of Assessing Officer. Similarly, appeal of assessee for impugned assessment year has been restored by Tribunal to file of Assessing Officer with certain 2 ITA No.2395/Del/2016 directions. He accordingly submitted that he has no objection if appeal filed by Revenue is also restored to file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in light of decision of Hon'ble High Court for assessment year 2010-11. 5. ld. DR has no objection for restoring issues to file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in light of direction of Tribunal. 6. We have heard both sides and perused material on record. In view of consent by both sides that matter should be restored to file of Assessing Officer in light of decision of Hon'ble High Court in assessee s own case for assessment year 2010-11, we restore both issues raised by Revenue in grounds of appeal to file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Needless to say, Assessing Officer shall give due opportunity of being heard to assessee and decide issue as per fact and law. We hold and direct accordingly. grounds raised by Revenue are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. 7. In result, appeal filed by Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes. decision was pronounced in open court on 02.09.2019. Sd/- Sd/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 02nd September, 2019 dk 3 ITA No.2395/Del/2016 Copy forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi 4 ACIT, Circle-51(1), New Delhi v. Nalini Jeweller
Report Error