S. K. Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-8(1), New Delhi
[Citation -2019-LL-0829-23]

Citation 2019-LL-0829-23
Appellant Name S. K. Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-8(1), New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 29/08/2019
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags ex-parte order • roc fees
Bot Summary: At the outset, i t was brought t o ou r noti ce that the appeal s have been adjudi cated ex-parte. The i ssues are addi ti on u/s 68 of the Act addi ti on on account of pay ment to ROC addi ti on on account of i nvocati on of Secti on 50C of the Act. The l d. CIT has fai rl y adjudi cated on the i ssue of addi ti on on account of payment to ROC on goi ng through the Secti on 37(1) of the IT Act. Furth er, the a ddi ti on on account of 50C of the Act has been adjudi cated based on the provi si ons of Secti on 69, Secti on 56(1)(vii )(b) of the Act. On account of addi ti on u/s 68 of the Act, the l d. CIT after dul y consi dering the wri tten submi ssi on made by the assessee has adjudi cated the i ssue rel yi ng on the order of ITAT Ahmadabad date d 18.08.2015 i n the case of Nakoda Fashi on Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No. 1716/Ahd/2012 for the assessment year 2009-10. Si mil arl y, for the ITA No.2983/Del /2017 for the assessment year 2012-13, the l d. CIT-17 vi de order dated 19.05.2015 has al so adjudi cated the matter on meri ts givi ng due reasons for adjudi cati on. Si nce, we fi nd that the appeal has bee n adjudi cated on meri ts taki ng i nto consi derati on all the facts, provi si ons of the Act and the judi ci al pronouncement and on goi ng through the record, we fi nd no re ason t o i nterfere wi th the orde r of the l d. CIT. T he appeal of the assessee i s hereby di smi ssed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES G, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 2982/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 S. K. Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of 1157, 3rd Floor, Kucha Mahajani, Income Tax, Circle-8(1), Chandani Chowk, New Delhi-110002 Delhi-110006 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCS6256N ITA No. 2983/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 S. K. Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of 1157, 3rd Floor, Kucha Mahajani, Income Tax, Circle-23(2), Chandani Chowk, New Delhi Delhi-110006 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCS6256N Assessee by : None Revenue by : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 27.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 29.08.2019 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: Both appeal s vi z. i n ITA No. 2982/Del /2017 for A.Y. 2011-12 of l d. CIT ( A)-22, Ne w Del hi dated 05.01.2017 and i n ITA No. 2983/Del /2017 for A.Y. 2012-13 of l d. CIT (A)- 17, New Del hi dated 01.12.2016. 2. None attended on behal f of assessee. 2 ITA Nos. 2982 & 2983/Del/2017 S K Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd. 3. At outset, i t was brought t o ou r noti ce that appeal s have been adjudi cated ex-parte. We have gone through record before us and fi nd that in appeal before l d. CIT (A) four grounds have been pl eaded by assessee i n grounds of appe al . i ssues are (a) addi ti on u/s 68 of Act (b) addi ti on on account of pay ment to ROC (c) addi ti on on account of i nvocati on of Secti on 50C of Act. 4. l d. CIT (A) has fai rl y adjudi cated on i ssue of addi ti on on account of payment to ROC on goi ng through Secti on 37(1) of IT Act. Furth er, a ddi ti on on account of 50C of Act has been adjudi cated based on provi si ons of Secti on 69, Secti on 56(1)(vii )(b) of Act. On account of addi ti on u/s 68 of Act, l d. CIT (A) after dul y consi dering wri tten submi ssi on made by assessee has adjudi cated i ssue rel yi ng on order of ITAT Ahmadabad date d 18.08.2015 i n case of Nakoda Fashi on Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No. 1716/Ahd/2012 for assessment year 2009-10. Si mil arl y, for ITA No.2983/Del /2017 for assessment year 2012-13, l d. CIT (A)-17 vi de order dated 19.05.2015 has al so adjudi cated matter on meri ts givi ng due reasons for adjudi cati on. Si nce, we fi nd that appeal has bee n adjudi cated on meri ts taki ng i nto consi derati on all facts, provi si ons of Act and judi ci al pronouncement and on goi ng through record, we fi nd no re ason t o i nterfere wi th orde r of l d. CIT (A). T he appeal of assessee i s hereby di smi ssed. 3 ITA Nos. 2982 & 2983/Del/2017 S K Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd. 5. In result, both appeals of assessee are dismissed. (Order Pron ounced i n Open Court on 29/08/2019). Sd/- Sd/- (Amit Shukla) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 29/08/2019 *Subodh* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S. K. Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-8(1), New Delhi
Report Error