Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-8 v. Rediff.com India Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0805-40]

Citation 2019-LL-0805-40
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-8
Respondent Name Rediff.com India Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 05/08/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags disallowance of expenses • exempt income
Bot Summary: Revenue is in the appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated 13.4.2016 raising following question for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified to confirm the order of the CIT(A) wherein restricting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer of Rs. 42,49,997/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D of the Act, ignoring the facts that the disallowance worked out by following Rule 8D provides uniform mechanism for working out disallowance of expenses which are attributable to earning exempt income 2. Perusal of the impugned judgment of the Tribunal would show that while confirming the view of the CIT(A), the 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 07/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2019 12:14:35 ::: 35. Os itxa 610-17.doc Tribunal recorded a finding that the assessee had not earned any exempt income during the year under consideration. In that view of the matter, disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act was not found justified. Such an issue has been examined by this Court on several occasions, reference can be made to the order dated 4.2.2019 passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 1672 of 2016.


35. os itxa 610-17.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 610 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -8 .. Appellant Versus M/s. Rediff.Com India Ltd .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 5, 2019. P.C.: 1. Revenue is in appeal against judgment of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ("the Tribunal" for short) dated 13.4.2016 raising following question for our consideration:- " Whether on facts and circumstances of case and in law, Tribunal was justified to confirm order of CIT(A) wherein restricting disallowance made by Assessing Officer of Rs. 42,49,997/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D of Act, ignoring facts that disallowance worked out by following Rule 8D provides uniform mechanism for working out disallowance of expenses which are attributable to earning exempt income?" 2. Perusal of impugned judgment of Tribunal would show that while confirming view of CIT(A), 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 07/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2019 12:14:35 ::: 35. os itxa 610-17.doc Tribunal recorded finding that assessee had not earned any exempt income during year under consideration. In that view of matter, disallowance under Section 14A of Income Tax Act was not found justified. Such issue has been examined by this Court on several occasions, reference can be made to order dated 4.2.2019 passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 1672 of 2016. In result, Income Tax Appeal is dismissed. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ] 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 07/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2019 12:14:35 ::: Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-8 v. Rediff.com India Ltd
Report Error