The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-9 v. Torus Business Solution Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0729-35]

Citation 2019-LL-0729-35
Appellant Name The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-9
Respondent Name Torus Business Solution Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 29/07/2019
Assessment Year 2010-11
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags comparables • functional dissimilarity
Bot Summary: This is an appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 10 th August 2018 passed by the ITAT in ITA No.1974/Del/2015 for Assessment Year 2010-11. The issue urged by the Revenue in the present case is about the exclusion of comparables which the ITAT held to be functionally different from the Assessee. Three of the comparables involved are Infosys BPO Ltd., TCS E-serve International Ltd. and TCS E-serve Ltd. This Court has very recently by a judgment dated 24th July 2019 in ITA 532 of 2019 giving detailed reasons why on the facts of that case, which are more or less similar to the facts on hand, such comparables ought to have been excluded. The said judgment therefore covers the said issue against the Revenue. As far as the comparables Accentia Techonologies Ltd. and E4e Healthcare are concerned, the Tribunal has in the impugned order explained in detail why these also should be excluded. The principles explained by this Court in the aforementioned judgment would be equally applicable to these comparables as well. Further, there are several other orders of this Court upholding the exclusion of the aforementioned comparables.


IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 207/2019 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9. Appellant Through: Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Sr.Standing Counsel. versus TORUS BUSINESS SOLUTION PVT. LTD Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vohra, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Rohit Tiwari, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER % 29.07.2019 1. This is appeal by Revenue against order dated 10 th August 2018 passed by ITAT in ITA No.1974/Del/2015 for Assessment Year ( AY ) 2010-11. 2. issue urged by Revenue in present case is about exclusion of comparables which ITAT held to be functionally different from Assessee. 3. Three of comparables involved are Infosys BPO Ltd., TCS E-serve International Ltd. and TCS E-serve Ltd. This Court has very recently by judgment dated 24th July 2019 in ITA 532 of 2019 (M/s.Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT) giving detailed reasons why on facts of that case, which are more or less similar to facts on hand, such comparables ought to have been excluded. said judgment therefore covers said issue against Revenue. 4. As far as comparables Accentia Techonologies Ltd. and E4e Healthcare are concerned, Tribunal has in impugned order explained in detail why these also should be excluded. principles explained by this Court in aforementioned judgment would be equally applicable to these comparables as well. 5. Further, there are several other orders of this Court upholding exclusion of aforementioned comparables. Illustratively reference may be made to orders in Pr.CIT v. Evalueserve SEZ (Gurgaon) Pvt. Ltd. (order dated 26th February 2018 in ITA 241 of 2018), Pr. CIT v. B.C.Management Services (P.) Ltd. 403 ITR 45 (Del) and Pr. CIT v. M/s. Sanvih Info Group Pvt. Ltd. (earlier known as OKS Span Tech ( P.) Ltd. (order dated 16th May 2019 in ITA 420 of 2019). 6. No substantial question of law arises. appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. TALWANT SINGH, J. JULY 29, 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-9 v. Torus Business Solution Pvt. Ltd
Report Error