IN HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2006 Commissioner of Income Tax . Appellant. Versus Damodar Mangalji Mining Company. . Respondent. Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for Appellant. Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for Respondent. Coram : M.S. Sonak & Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ. Date : 16th July, 2019. P.C.:- Ms. Linhares, learned Standing Counsel for Appellant fairly states that relief in present Appeal has been rendered infructuous, in view of decision of this Court dated 23 rd June, 2009 in Tax Appeal No.8/2004, which was in fact connected matter. Ms. V. Palyekar, learned Counsel for Respondent also supports submission made by Ms. Linhares and urges disposal of this Appeal on ground that same has been rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. Nutan D. Sardessai, J. M.S. Sonak, J. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Damodar Mangalji Mining Company