IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1243 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 31 .. Appellant. v/s. M/s. Mamta Enterprises .. Respondent. Mr. Arvind Pinto, for Appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b. Mr. Niraj, for Respondent. CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2019. P.C: This Appeal under Section 260 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2 Mr. Pinto, learned Counsel for Revenue, states that he has been instructed not to press this appeal. This for reason that tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018. 3 Therefore, this Appeal is dismissed, as not pressed. 4 Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) S.R.JOSHI Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-31 v. Mamta Enterprise