C.I.T Central-I, Mumbai v. Rajendra R Chaturvedi
[Citation -2018-LL-1023-8]

Citation 2018-LL-1023-8
Appellant Name C.I.T Central-I, Mumbai
Respondent Name Rajendra R Chaturvedi
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/10/2018
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect


1 IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5002 OF 2012 C.I.T CENTRAL-I MUMBAI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAJENDRA R CHATURVEDI RESPONDENT(S) ORDER In this appeal, tax effect is less than Rs. 1 Crore and is covered by Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 as amended by Circular dated 20.08.2018 of Central Board of Direct Taxes. appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ... ................J. (A.K. SIKRI) ... ................J. (ASHOK BHUSHAN) NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 23, 2018 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA Date: 2018.10.23 18:22:05 IST Reason: 2 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 5002/2012 C.I.T CENTRAL-I MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS RAJENDRA R CHATURVEDI Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 20152/2012 (IX) Date : 23-10-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, ASG Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Vasudevan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Kunal Cheema, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Ms. Aditi Deshpande Parkhi, Adv. Ms. Ayiala Imti, Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Civil Appeal No. 5002/2012: appeal is dismissed on ground of low tax effect. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. S.L.P.(C) No. 20152/2012: Special Leave Petition is dismissed on ground of low tax effect. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order is placed on file.) C.I.T Central-I, Mumbai v. Rajendra R Chaturvedi
Report Error