Commissioner of Income-tax 11, Mumbai v. Goodwill Theatres Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2017-LL-1129-3]

Citation 2017-LL-1129-3
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax 11, Mumbai
Respondent Name Goodwill Theatres Pvt. Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 29/11/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags non-removal of defect • technical grounds
Bot Summary: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and order dated 06.06.2016 passed by the the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Income Tax Appeal No.2356 of 2013 whereby the High Court has dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant herein only on the ground that the decision relied upon by the Tribunal i.e. in the case of Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Mumbai 111 ITD 1, the appeal was preferred before the High Court and for non-removal of the defects the appeal has been dismissed. We are of the considered opinion that this was not a correct approach of the High Court for the simple reason that merely because one authority has followed its own decision in another case and that matter in appeal has been Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2017.12.01 dismissed on technical grounds still the High Court has to 17:02:49 IST Reason: decide the question on merits. We set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court and remand the matter back to the High Court for deciding the same on merits expeditiously and in accordance with law. The Civil Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.


1 IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.19944/2017 [@ SLP (C) NO.6404/2017] COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 11, MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GOODWILL THEATRES PVT LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for parties and perused impugned judgment and order dated 06.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Income Tax Appeal No.2356 of 2013 whereby High Court has dismissed appeal preferred by appellant herein only on ground that decision relied upon by Tribunal i.e. in case of Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Mumbai (2008) 111 ITD 1 (Mum) (SB)], appeal was preferred before High Court and for non-removal of defects appeal has been dismissed. We are of considered opinion that this was not correct approach of High Court for simple reason that merely because one authority has followed its own decision in another case and that matter in appeal has been Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2017.12.01 dismissed on technical grounds still High Court has to 17:02:49 IST Reason: decide question on merits. 2 Therefore, we set aside impugned judgment and order passed by High Court and remand matter back to High Court for deciding same on merits expeditiously and in accordance with law. Civil Appeal is disposed of in above terms. ...................J. [R.K. AGRAWAL] ..................J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL] NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER 29, 2017 3 ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.8 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.19944/2017 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No.6404/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 11, MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GOODWILL THEATRES PVT LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Respondent(s) Date : 29-11-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. H.R. Rao, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Leave granted. Civil Appeal is disposed of in terms of signed order. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on file) Commissioner of Income-tax 11, Mumbai v. Goodwill Theatres Pvt. Ltd
Report Error