Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.B. Exports Ltd
[Citation -2017-LL-0720-13]

Citation 2017-LL-0720-13
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name J.B. Exports Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/07/2017
Assessment Year 1995-96
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags interest paid
Bot Summary: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 6th October, 2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 6214/Del/1997 for the Assessment Year 1995-96. While admitting the appeal on 13th September, 2005, the following two questions of law were framed for determination: a) Whether the ITAT was correct in law in allowing deduction under Section 80 HHC to the assessee on the amount of interest from FDRs without applying the provisions of Explanation to Section 80 HHC of the Act b) Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to reduce interest paid by it from the interest received by it while calculating deduction under section 80 HHC read with Explanation of the Income Tax Act 3. Both questions stand answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Ram Honda Power Equip 289 ITR 475. Accordingly, both questions are answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.


IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 383/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate. versus M/S J.B. EXPORTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER 20.07.2017 1. This appeal by Revenue is directed against order dated 6th October, 2004 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No. 6214/Del/1997 for Assessment Year ( AY ) 1995-96. 2. While admitting appeal on 13th September, 2005, following two questions of law were framed for determination: a) Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing deduction under Section 80 HHC to assessee on amount of interest from FDRs without applying provisions of Explanation (baa) to Section 80 HHC of Act? b) Whether ITAT was correct in law in holding that assessee is entitled to reduce interest paid by it from interest received by it while calculating deduction under section 80 HHC read with Explanation (baa) of Income Tax Act? 3. Both questions stand answered in favour of Assessee and against Revenue by decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Shri Ram Honda Power Equip (2007) 289 ITR 475 (Del). Accordingly, both questions are answered in affirmative i.e. in favour of Assessee and against Revenue. 4. appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J JULY 20, 2017/j Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.B. Exports Ltd
Report Error