IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2961 of 2017 (Santosh Kumar s/o. Hazarilal Agrawal .vs. Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Nagpur) with Writ Petition No.3311 of 2017 (Purshottam s/o. Hazarilal Agrawal .vs. Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Nagpur) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr.N.S.Bhattad, Advocate with Mr.Saket Bhattad, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.Anand Parchure, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhushan Mohta, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATE : 5.7.2017. 1. These two petitions under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenge two orders dated 29 th July, 2016, one in respect of each of petitioners before us. impugned orders have rejected petitioners' applications u/s.119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) to enable them to file their returns of income beyond prescribed last date to file same. 2. Mr.Anand Parchure, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Revenue, on instructions, requests that they be given leave to withdraw impugned orders dated 29th July, 2016 and thereafter, pass fresh ::: Uploaded on - 06/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/07/2017 09:43:15 ::: 2 57wp2961.17.odt order in accordance with law. Liberty, as sought for, is granted. 3. Needless to state that Commissioner of Income Tax would dispose of petitioners' applications as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, within period of eight weeks from today 4. In view of above, Mr.N.S.Bhattad, learned Counsel for petitioners seeks to withdraw both petitions. Hence, petitions are disposed of as 'withdrawn'. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal ::: Uploaded on - 06/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/07/2017 09:43:15 ::: Santosh Kumar v. Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Nagpur