Ess Dee Aluminium Ltd. and Etc v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (Inv.) and Ors
[Citation -2016-LL-1117-7]

Citation 2016-LL-1117-7
Appellant Name Ess Dee Aluminium Ltd. and Etc
Respondent Name Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (Inv.) and Ors.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/11/2016
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags search proceedings
Bot Summary: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER The petitioners have approached this Court on the only ground that under Section 246-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has no jurisdiction to examine the validity of the search operations carried on under Section 132 of the said Act. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2016.11.18 Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners has 17:53:09 IST Reason: further submitted that the foundation of the assessment 1 made hereunder is the search operations carried on against the petitioners. We are of the considered opinion that if the assessment order which is based on the search operations is under challenge, the validity of the search proceedings can also be gone into by the Commissioner of Income Tax. We do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. If the appeal is filed within four weeks from today, the appeal shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation. In view of the above, the special leave petitions stand disposed of. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.


ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5-6/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 15734-15735/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/04/2016 in WP Nos.828/2016 and 829/2016 passed by High Court of Judicature at Bombay) ESS DEE ALUMINIUM LTD. AND ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUS DY. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV) AND ORS. Respondent(s) (For stay) Date : 17/11/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yashank Adhiyaru,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Niranjan Sahu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.Radhakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu,Adv. For Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER petitioners have approached this Court on only ground that under Section 246-A of Income Tax Act, 1961, Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has no jurisdiction to examine validity of search operations carried on under Section 132 of said Act. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2016.11.18 Learned senior counsel appearing for petitioners has 17:53:09 IST Reason: further submitted that foundation of assessment 1 made hereunder is search operations carried on against petitioners. We are of considered opinion that if assessment order which is based on search operations is under challenge, validity of search proceedings can also be gone into by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). We do not find any good ground to interfere with impugned order at this stage. If appeal is filed within four weeks from today, appeal shall not be dismissed on ground of limitation. In view of above, special leave petitions stand disposed of. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Anita Malhotra) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) Court Master Court Master 2 Ess Dee Aluminium Ltd. and Etc v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (Inv.) and Or
Report Error