Rajbir Singh Verma v. ITO, Ward-49(4), New Delhi
[Citation -2016-LL-1021-149]

Citation 2016-LL-1021-149
Appellant Name Rajbir Singh Verma
Respondent Name ITO, Ward-49(4), New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/10/2016
Assessment Year 2009-10
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags dismissing the appeal in limine
Bot Summary: New Delhi PAN-ABPPV2450F Assessee by None Revenue by Sh.Anil Sharma, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 06.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement 21.10.2016 ORDER All these appeals have been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the separate orders dated 08.12.2015 of the CIT(A)-17, New Delhi pertaining to 2009-10; 2010-11; and 2010-2011 AYs respectively on various grounds. No one was present on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. Even in the third round, the position remained the same as neither the assessee is represented nor there is any adjournment on record. The record shows that the notice has been sent to the assessee on 29.07.2016 at the address indicated in Column No.10, despite this the said notice has not been returned unserved. Accordingly, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeals. 612 to 614/Del/2016 the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeals of the assessee in limine. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC-1 NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .No.-612/Del/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10) Rajbir Singh Verma, Vs ITO, WZ-1253, Nangal Raya, Ward-49(4), New Delhi-110046. New Delhi PAN-ABPPV2450F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .No.-613/Del/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR- 2010-11) Rajbir Singh Verma, Vs ITO, WZ-1253, Nangal Raya, Ward-27(4), New Delhi-110046. New Delhi PAN-ABPPV2450F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) I.T.A .No.-614/Del/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR- 2010-11) Rajbir Singh Verma, Vs ITO, WZ-1253, Nangal Raya, Range-27, New Delhi-110046. New Delhi PAN-ABPPV2450F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by None Revenue by Sh.Anil Sharma, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 06.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement 21.10.2016 ORDER All these appeals have been filed by assessee assailing correctness of separate orders dated 08.12.2015 of CIT(A)-17, New Delhi pertaining to 2009-10; 2010-11; and 2010-2011 AYs respectively on various grounds. 2. However, no one was present on behalf of assessee at time of hearing. appeals were passed over twice. Even in third round, position remained same as neither assessee is represented nor there is any adjournment on record. record shows that notice has been sent to assessee on 29.07.2016 at address indicated in Column No.10, despite this said notice has not been returned unserved. Accordingly, in peculiar facts and circumstances of present case, it can be safely presumed that assessee is not serious in pursuing present appeals. Accordingly in I.T.A .No.-612 to 614/Del/2016 absence of any representation or petition seeking time, only alternative left is to dismiss appeals of assessee in limine. Support is drawn from order of Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). 3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case assessee is able to show that there was reasonable cause for non-representation on date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for recall of this order. said order was pronounced on date of hearing itself in open Court. 4. In result, appeals of assessee are dismissed. order is pronounced in open court on 21st of October, 2016. Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2 Rajbir Singh Verma v. ITO, Ward-49(4), New Delhi
Report Error