Salim Ali v. ITO, Ward-2(1), Dehradun
[Citation -2016-LL-1021-135]
| Citation | 2016-LL-1021-135 |
|---|---|
| Appellant Name | Salim Ali |
| Respondent Name | ITO, Ward-2(1), Dehradun |
| Court | ITAT-Delhi |
| Relevant Act | Income-tax |
| Date of Order | 21/10/2016 |
| Assessment Year | 2007-08 |
| Judgment | View Judgment |
| Keyword Tags | reasonable explanation • dismissing the appeal in limine |
| Bot Summary: | PAN-AJOPA9077A Assessee by None Revenue by Sh.A.K.Sharma, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 05.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement 21.10.2016 ORDER All these appeal have been filed by the different assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 23.12.2014 of the CIT(A), Dehradun pertaining to 2007-08 AY on various grounds and decided by a common order. Even in the third round, the position remained the same as neither the assessee is represented nor there is any adjournment on record. The record shows that the notices have been sent to the assessee on 20.07.2016 at the address indicated in Column No.10, despite this the assessee remained unrepresented. It is further seen that the appeals were earlier fixed on 19.07.2016 on which date also the assessee I.T.A.No. Accordingly, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeals. Accordingly in the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeals of the assessee in limine. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed. |