Akash Bhasin v. Addl. CIT, Range-23 (Old Range-25), New Delhi
[Citation -2016-LL-1019-33]

Citation 2016-LL-1019-33
Appellant Name Akash Bhasin
Respondent Name Addl. CIT, Range-23 (Old Range-25), New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/10/2016
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags application for adjournment • dismissing the appeal in limine
Bot Summary: In this case the Notice was sent to the Assessee for hearing by Regd. AD Post for today i.e. 19.10.2016 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10, but the same was returned back unserved. On 19.10.2016, neither the assessee nor his authorised representative attended the hearing and also not filed any application for adjournment and also no fresh address has been given by the Assessee I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to serve the notice again and again to the assessee on the same address. In view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of his appeal. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 and Hon ble Madhya Pradesh High Court s decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480, I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently if the assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the appeal. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.


IN INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC-3 : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 4005/Del/2016 A.Y. : 2011-12 MR. AKASH BHASIN, VS. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-23, FLAT NO. 1, COTTAGE ENCLAVE, (OLD RANGE-25) PRASHANT VIHAR, ROOM NO. 1706, 17TH FLOOR, DELHI BLOCK-E-2, CIVIC CENTRE, (PAN: AGZPB4951A) NEW DELHI 110 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Department by : Smt. F.R. Meena, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 19-10-2016 Date of Order : 19-10-2016 ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal is filed by Assessee is directed against Order dated 7.4.2016 of Ld. CIT(A)-14, New Delhi relevant to assessment year 2011-12. 2. In this case Notice was sent to Assessee for hearing by Regd. AD Post for today i.e. 19.10.2016 at address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10, but same was returned back unserved. 3. On 19.10.2016, neither assessee nor his authorised representative attended hearing and also not filed any application for adjournment and also no fresh address has been given by Assessee, hence, I am of view that no useful purpose would be served to serve notice again and again to assessee on same address. In view of above, it is thus inferred that assessee is not interested in prosecution of his appeal. Page 1 of 3 4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon ble Madhya Pradesh High Court s decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss same. I would like to clarify that subsequently if assessee explains reasons for non appearance and if Bench is so satisfied, matter may be recalled for purpose of adjudication of appeal. 5. In result, Appeal of assessee is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in Open Court on 19-10-2016. SD/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:19/10/2016 SRBhatnagar Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY By Order, Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3 Akash Bhasin v. Addl. CIT, Range-23 (Old Range-25), New Delhi
Report Error