Johnson Pump (India) Ltd. (Now known as SPX Flow Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd.) v. ACIT (OSD), Cir.8, Ahmedabad
[Citation -2016-LL-1007-115]

Citation 2016-LL-1007-115
Appellant Name Johnson Pump (India) Ltd. (Now known as SPX Flow Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd.)
Respondent Name ACIT (OSD), Cir.8, Ahmedabad
Court ITAT-Ahmedabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 07/10/2016
Assessment Year 2004-05
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags computing deduction • total turnover • excise duty • sales tax
Bot Summary: Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are not in consonance with the Rule 8 of the Income Tax Rules, 1963 - they are descriptive and argumentative in nature. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of income on 30.10.2004 declaring total income at Rs.1,13,65,560/-. The assessee has claimed deduction under section 80HHC. While computing such deduction, it has excluded excise duty and sales tax aggregating to Rs.16,13,55,627/- from the total turnover. AO did not approve this type of calculation by following judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s.Chowringhee Sales Bureau Pvt. Ltd., 87 ITR 542. The assessee contended before the AO that this issue is squarely covered by the decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sudarshan Chemical Industries ltd. AO did not accept the contention of the assessee on the ground that this decision was not accepted by the Revenue, and it was challenged before the Hon ble Supreme Court. Hon ble Supreme Court has upheld view taken by the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. It has been held that sales-tax and excise duty would not form part of the total turnover while computing the deduction under section 80HHC. Therefore, we allow the appeal of the assessee and direct the AO to compute the deduction after excluding the sales tax and excise duty from the total turnover.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.1620/Ahd/2012 Asstt. Year: 2004-2005 Johnson Pump (India) Ltd. ACIT (OSD) (Now known as SPX Flow Technology Vs Cir.8, Ahmedabad. (India) Pvt.Ltd., Survey No.275 Opp: Murlidhar Society Odhav Road, Odhav Ahmedabad 382 415. PAN : AAACS 7234 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri N.B. Shah, AR Revenue by : Shri James Kurian, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 29/09/2016 Date of Pronouncement: 07/10/2016 ORDER PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessee is in appeal against order of ld.CIT(A)-4, Mumbai dated 18.5.2012 for Astt.Year 2004-05. 2. Grounds of appeal taken by assessee are not in consonance with Rule 8 of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 - they are descriptive and argumentative in nature. In brief issue involved in this appeal is whether while computing deduction admissible under section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, sales-tax and excise duty are required to be excluded from total turnover. ITA No.1620/Ahd/2012 2 3. Brief facts of case are that assessee has filed its return of income on 30.10.2004 declaring total income at Rs.1,13,65,560/-. assessee has claimed deduction under section 80HHC. While computing such deduction, it has excluded excise duty and sales tax aggregating to Rs.16,13,55,627/- from total turnover. Theld.AO did not approve this type of calculation by following judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in case of M/s.Chowringhee Sales Bureau Pvt. Ltd., 87 ITR 542. assessee contended before AO that this issue is squarely covered by decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in case of CIT Vs. Sudarshan Chemical Industries ltd., 245 ITR 769 (Bom). ld.AO did not accept contention of assessee on ground that this decision was not accepted by Revenue, and it was challenged before Hon ble Supreme Court. 4. It is brought to our notice that issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of assessee by decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in case of CIT Vs. Lakshmi Machine Works, 290 ITR 667. Hon ble Supreme Court has upheld view taken by Hon ble Bombay High Court in case of Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. (supra). It has been held that sales-tax and excise duty would not form part of total turnover while computing deduction under section 80HHC. Therefore, we allow appeal of assessee and direct AO to compute deduction after excluding sales tax and excise duty from total turnover. 5. In result, appeal of assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in Court on 7th October, 2016 at Ahmedabad. Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH BORAD) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANTN MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 07/10/2016 Johnson Pump (India) Ltd. (Now known as SPX Flow Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd.) v. ACIT (OSD), Cir.8, Ahmedabad
Report Error