M/s. Sanat M. Dalal Securities P. Ltd. v. ITO(TDS)-3(2), Mumbai
[Citation -2016-LL-1003-17]

Citation 2016-LL-1003-17
Appellant Name M/s. Sanat M. Dalal Securities P. Ltd.
Respondent Name ITO(TDS)-3(2), Mumbai
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/10/2016
Assessment Year 2008-09
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags deduct tax at source • stock exchange • non deduction of tds • fee for technical services
Bot Summary: PAN No.AAFCS1400A Assessee by Shri N.S. Bhimani Department by Shri Suman Kumar Date of Hearing 3.10.2016 Date of Pronouncement 3.10.2016 ORDER Per B.R. Baskaran :- The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 24.6.2016 passed by learned CIT(A)-14, Mumbai for A.Y. 2008-09 confirming the order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. The Assessing Officer treated the assessee as assessee in default since the assessee did not deduct tax at source on the transaction charges paid to the stock exchange. The Assessing Officer took the view that the assessee should have deducted tax at source u/s. 194J of the Act on the amount of 4,37,645/- paid by the assessee to the stock exchange. We have noticed that the above said issue has since been decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee in the case of CIT Vs. Kotak Securities Ltd. 384 ITR 1, wherein it was held that the transaction charges paid to the stock exchange is for providing facility and it is not fees for technical services and hence no tax is required to be deducted u/s. Accordingly, following the decision rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court(supra), we set aside the order passed by learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the impugned demand raised upon the assessee u/s. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E Bench, Mumbai Before Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM)& Ramlal Negi (JM) I.T.A. No. 5568/Mum/2014 (Assessment Year 2008-09) M/s. Sanat M. Dalal ITO(TDS)-3(2) Securities P. Ltd. Vs. Room No. 910 Examiner Press Building Smt.K.G. Mittal Dalal Street, Fort Ayurvedic Hospital Mumbai-400 001. Building Charni Road Mumbai-400 002. (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No.AAFCS1400A Assessee by Shri N.S. Bhimani Department by Shri Suman Kumar Date of Hearing 3.10.2016 Date of Pronouncement 3.10.2016 ORDER Per B.R. Baskaran (AM) :- assessee has filed this appeal challenging order dated 24.6.2016 passed by learned CIT(A)-14, Mumbai for A.Y. 2008-09 confirming order passed by Assessing Officer u/s. 201(1) and 201(1A) of Income Tax Act. 2. We have heard parties and perused record. Assessing Officer treated assessee as assessee in default since assessee did not deduct tax at source on transaction charges paid to stock exchange. Assessing Officer took view that assessee should have deducted tax at source u/s. 194J of Act on amount of ` 4,37,645/- paid by assessee to stock exchange. Accordingly Assessing Officer raised demand u/s. 201(1) of Act and levied interest u/s. 201(1A) of Act. Learned CIT(A) also confirmed same. 2 Sanat M. Dalal Securities P. Ltd. 3. We have noticed that above said issue has since been decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in favour of assessee in case of CIT Vs. Kotak Securities Ltd. (2016) 384 ITR 1, wherein it was held that transaction charges paid to stock exchange is for providing facility and it is not fees for technical services and hence no tax is required to be deducted u/s. 194J of Act. Accordingly, following decision rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court(supra), we set aside order passed by learned CIT(A) and direct Assessing Officer to delete impugned demand raised upon assessee u/s. 201(1) & 201(1A) of Act. 4. In result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed. Order has been pronounced in Court on 3.10.2016 Sd/- Sd/- (RAMLAL NEGI) (B.R.BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated : 3/10/2016 Copy of Order forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) PS ITAT, Mumbai M/s. Sanat M. Dalal Securities P. Ltd. v. ITO(TDS)-3(2), Mumbai
Report Error