Income-tax Officer, Ward-1, Navsari v. M/s. Dhirubhai Kanjibhai Patel (HUF)
[Citation -2016-LL-0930-180]

Citation 2016-LL-0930-180
Appellant Name Income-tax Officer, Ward-1, Navsari
Respondent Name M/s. Dhirubhai Kanjibhai Patel (HUF)
Court ITAT-Ahmedabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 30/09/2016
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags quantum appeal
Bot Summary: The roots for the levy of penalty lie in the assessment order dated 30.12.2008 made u/s. The quantum addition travelled up to the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide order dated 30.08.2013 in ITA No. 1745/Ahd/2010 has allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee by accepting the gains from sale of plots under the head capital gains. The First Appellate Authority deleted the penalty so levied on the strength of the findings of the Tribunal. In the statement of facts filed by the revenue, the revenue has taken a stand that though the quantum appeal has been decided in favour of the assessee. 260A before the Hon ble Gujarat High Court against the quantum appeal. In our understanding, this cannot be any ground for filing the appeal before the Tribunal, since; the quantum additions have been deleted. Appeal filed by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH (BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA. No: 941/AHD/2014 (Assessment Year: 2006-07) Income-tax Officer, Ward- V/S M/s. Dhirubhai Kanjibhai 1, Navsari Patel (HUF), Bal Mandir Falia, Kachhiawadi, Navsari (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAEHD5625A Appellant by : Shri Prasoon Kabra, Sr. D.R. Respondent by : Shri Rasesh Shah ORDER Date of hearing : 30 -09-2016 Date of Pronouncement : 30 -09-2016 PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. This appeal by Revenue is preferred against order of Ld. CIT(A), Valsad dated 03.01.2014 pertaining to A.Y. 2006-07. 2 ITA No. 941/Ahd/2014 . A.Y. 2006-07 2. sole grievance of revenue is that ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting penalty of Rs. 10,98,130/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Act. 3. roots for levy of penalty lie in assessment order dated 30.12.2008 made u/s. 143(3) of Act by ITO, Ward-1, Navsari. 4. While completing assessment, A.O. treated gains of Rs. 73,75,402/- on sale of plots as business income of assessee and taxed accordingly. 5. quantum addition travelled up to Tribunal and Tribunal vide order dated 30.08.2013 in ITA No. 1745/Ahd/2010 has allowed appeal in favour of assessee by accepting gains from sale of plots under head capital gains . 6. A.O. levied penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of Act on strength of aforementioned assessment order. First Appellate Authority deleted penalty so levied on strength of findings of Tribunal (supra). 7. In statement of facts filed by revenue, revenue has taken stand that though quantum appeal has been decided in favour of assessee. revenue has preferred appeal u/s. 260A before Hon ble Gujarat High Court against quantum appeal. In our understanding, this cannot be any ground for filing appeal before Tribunal, since; quantum additions have been deleted. 3 ITA No. 941/Ahd/2014 . A.Y. 2006-07 8. We decline to interfere with findings of ld. CIT(A). Appeal filed by Revenue is accordingly dismissed. Order pronounced in Open Court on 30 - 09- 2016. Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (N. K. BILLAIYA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: True Copy Rajesh Copy of Order forwarded to:- 1. Appellant. 2. Respondent. 3. CIT (Appeals) 4. CIT concerned. 5. DR., ITAT, Ahmedabad. 6. Guard File. By ORDER Deputy/Asstt.Registrar ITAT,Ahmedabad Income-tax Officer, Ward-1, Navsari v. M/s. Dhirubhai Kanjibhai Patel (HUF)
Report Error