Suryakant V. Ambarwadikar v. ACIT, Circle-2, Aurangabad
[Citation -2016-LL-0923-90]

Citation 2016-LL-0923-90
Appellant Name Suryakant V. Ambarwadikar
Respondent Name ACIT, Circle-2, Aurangabad
Court ITAT-Pune
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/09/2016
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags outstanding demand • stay of demand of tax
Bot Summary: 09.2016 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM : The assessee through this bunch of Stay Applications has requested the Tribunal to stay on the realization of outstanding demand for different assessment years as mentioned in the respective Stay Applications. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the time of hearing submitted that the assessee does not want to press the Stay Applications at this juncture since the AO has already allowed 2 instalments for payment of the outstanding demands. He accordingly submitted that assessee seeks permission to withdraw the Stay Applications filed by him. In view of the above and in absence of any objection from the Ld. Departmental Representative the plea of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee seeking withdrawal of the stay applications is accepted. The stay applications filed by the assessee are accordingly dismissed. In the result, the stay applications filed by the assessee are dismissed. Pronounced in the Open Court at the time hearing itself, i.e. on 23-09-2016.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B , PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM S.A. Nos.50 to 55/PN/2016 (Arising out of ITA Nos.1105 to 1110/PN/2016) Assessment Years : 2006-007 to 2011-12 Shri Suryakant V. Ambarwadikar, Prop. Garden Court Bar & Applicant Restaurant and Surya Lawns, Beed Bye pass Road, Satara Parisar, Aurangabad-431010 PAN : AELPA0578E v/s ACIT, Circle-2, Aurangabad Respondent Applicant by : Shri M.K. Kulkarni Respondent by : Shri Hitendra Ninawe h Date of Hearing : 23.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement:23.09.2016 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM : assessee through this bunch of Stay Applications has requested Tribunal to stay on realization of outstanding demand for different assessment years as mentioned in respective Stay Applications. 2. Ld. Counsel for assessee at time of hearing submitted that assessee does not want to press Stay Applications at this juncture since AO has already allowed 2 instalments for payment of outstanding demands. He accordingly submitted that assessee seeks permission to withdraw Stay Applications filed by him. 3. In view of above and in absence of any objection from Ld. Departmental Representative plea of Ld. Counsel for assessee seeking withdrawal of stay applications is accepted. stay applications filed by assessee are accordingly dismissed. 4. In result, stay applications filed by assessee are dismissed. Pronounced in Open Court at time hearing itself, i.e. on 23-09-2016. Sd/- Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Pune; Dated : 23rd September, 2016. Copy of Order forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A)-II, Aurangabad 4. CIT-II, Aurangabad 5. DR, ITAT, B Pune; 6. - Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy True Copy (Sr. Private Secretary ), ITAT, Pune Suryakant V. Ambarwadikar v. ACIT, Circle-2, Aurangabad
Report Error