Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors. v. Techniplex and Anr
[Citation -2016-LL-0112-75]

Citation 2016-LL-0112-75
Appellant Name Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors.
Respondent Name Techniplex and Anr.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 12/01/2016
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER In pursuance of the impugned order passed by the High Court, the Petitioner-Board has already taken a fresh decision. Thus, the said order has been acted upon and therefore, the petition has become infructuous. The said decision has also been challenged in the High Court Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sarita Purohit Date: 2016.01.14 by filing Writ Petition No.1758 of 2015, which is pending 16:38:13 IST Reason: at present. 1 If the order which might be passed by the High Court in the afore-stated petition is challenged before this Court, it would be open to the petitioners to raise all contentions, including the contentions which have already been raised in this petition. In view of the above observations, the special leave petition stands disposed of.


ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.16920/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/03/2015 in WP No.2922/2014 passed by High Court of Bombay) CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TECHNIPLEX AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. for permission to place addl. Documents on record and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) Date : 12/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K. Kaul,ASG Mr. Ritesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Samar Singh Kachwaha,Adv. Ms. Sadhna Sandhu,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amar Dave,Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh,Adv. For Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER In pursuance of impugned order passed by High Court, Petitioner-Board has already taken fresh decision. Thus, said order has been acted upon and therefore, petition has become infructuous. said decision has also been challenged in High Court Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sarita Purohit Date: 2016.01.14 by filing Writ Petition No.1758 of 2015, which is pending 16:38:13 IST Reason: at present. 1 If order which might be passed by High Court in afore-stated petition is challenged before this Court, it would be open to petitioners to raise all contentions, including contentions which have already been raised in this petition. In view of above observations, special leave petition stands disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar 2 Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors. v. Techniplex and Anr
Report Error