Addl Director of Income-Tax v. Pgs Geophysical As
[Citation -2015-LL-0515-17]

Citation 2015-LL-0515-17
Appellant Name Addl Director of Income-Tax
Respondent Name Pgs Geophysical As
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 15/05/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that the Review Petition had been filed in the High Court by the respondent and the said Review Petition has been Signature Not Verified allowed. Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2015.05.16 11:30:27 IST Reason: In these circumstances, this petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. 2 Needless to say, it would be open to the parties to raise all permissible submissions before the High Court as and when the appeal is heard by the High Court. As the petition has not been decided on merits, it would be open to the concerned party to approach this Court on a fresh cause of action, if and when necessary.


ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2372/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgement and order dated 09/07/2014 in ITA No. 612/2012 passed by High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUS PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 15/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. D. L. Chidananda, Adv. Mr. T. N. Razdan, Adv. for Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh Butani, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Adv. Mr. S. S. Tomar, Adv. for Mr. Anil Kumar Gautam, Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER learned counsel appearing for respondent has submitted that Review Petition had been filed in High Court by respondent and said Review Petition has been Signature Not Verified allowed. Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2015.05.16 11:30:27 IST Reason: In these circumstances, this petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. 2 Needless to say, it would be open to parties to raise all permissible submissions before High Court as and when appeal is heard by High Court. As petition has not been decided on merits, it would be open to concerned party to approach this Court on fresh cause of action, if and when necessary. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P.A. Assistant Registrar Addl Director of Income-Tax v. Pgs Geophysical A
Report Error