The Commissione of Income-tax-III, Kolkata v. PFH Mall & Retail Management Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2015-LL-0507-40]

Citation 2015-LL-0507-40
Appellant Name The Commissione of Income-tax-III, Kolkata
Respondent Name PFH Mall & Retail Management Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 07/05/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: On 7th April, 2015, the appeal was directed to be listed under the heading For Dismissal. On 9th April, 2015, the appeal was listed under the heading For Dismissal when no one appeared for the appellant. The 2 matter was again directed to be listed under the heading For Dismissal with endorsement 3. On 16th April, 2015, when the appeal appeared with the endorsement 3 under the heading For Dismissal , Mr.Soumitra Mukherjee appeared and prayed for adjournment which was allowed. The matter again appeared in the list on 23rd April, 2015. On 23rd April, 2015, this court directed Mr. Mukherjee to give a notice to the advocate of the respondent. Mr.Dutta appearing for the appellant submitted that he has been engaged only yesterday and he has no instruction as regards the service.


ORDER SHEET ITA NO.6 OF 2011 IN HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction(Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMR. OF I.T. III, KOLKATA Versus PFH MALL & RETAIL MANAGEMENT PVT LTD. BEFORE: Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 7th May, 2015. MR.S.N.DUTTA,ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT Court : appeal was admitted on 20th December, 2010. Thereafter no steps were taken to serve notice of appeal. On 7th April, 2015, appeal was directed to be listed under heading For Dismissal . On 9th April, 2015, appeal was listed under heading For Dismissal when no one appeared for appellant. 2 matter was again directed to be listed under heading For Dismissal with endorsement 3 . On 16th April, 2015, when appeal appeared with endorsement 3 under heading For Dismissal , Mr.Soumitra Mukherjee appeared and prayed for adjournment which was allowed. matter again appeared in list on 23rd April, 2015. Still no steps were taken to serve. On 23rd April, 2015, this court directed Mr. Mukherjee to give notice to advocate of respondent. Even that has not been done. Mr.Dutta appearing for appellant submitted that he has been engaged only yesterday and he has no instruction as regards service. This goes to show that appellant is not interested. When appellant is not interested there is nothing that court can do. Therefore, appeal is dismissed. (GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) sb. Commissione of Income-tax-III, Kolkata v. PFH Mall & Retail Management Pvt. Ltd
Report Error