Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Hyderabad v. Goldstone Technologies LTd
[Citation -2015-LL-0325-119]

Citation 2015-LL-0325-119
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Hyderabad
Respondent Name Goldstone Technologies LTd.
Court HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/03/2015
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: 18 and 19 of 2015 COMMON ORDER: It appears from the record that the certified copies of the impugned orders have been underlined and marked by a person other than the Court. Liberty is given to the appellants to file fresh appeals with fresh certified copies. It appears it is the regular feature of the revenue department that the appeals are being filed with underlined certified copies. We direct the registry not to accept any appeal if it is found on scrutiny that the certified copy of the impugned order is underlined and marked and must return the same.


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HON BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. Nos. 18 AND 19 OF 2015 DATE: 25.03.2015 ITTA.No.18 of 2015 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Hyderabad. Petitioner And M/s. Goldstone Technologies Ltd., Secunderabad. Respondent This Court made following: HON BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. Nos. 18 and 19 of 2015 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon ble Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) It appears from record that certified copies of impugned orders have been underlined and marked by person other than Court. Hence, on that ground alone we dismiss appeals. However, liberty is given to appellants to file fresh appeals with fresh certified copies. It appears it is regular feature of revenue department that appeals are being filed with underlined certified copies. Hence, we direct registry not to accept any appeal if it is found on scrutiny that certified copy of impugned order is underlined and marked and must return same. _ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date: 25.03.2015 ES Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Hyderabad v. Goldstone Technologies LTd
Report Error