Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Hyderabad v. Goldstone Technologies LTd
[Citation -2015-LL-0325-119]
Citation | 2015-LL-0325-119 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Hyderabad |
Respondent Name | Goldstone Technologies LTd. |
Court | HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 25/03/2015 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Bot Summary: | 18 and 19 of 2015 COMMON ORDER: It appears from the record that the certified copies of the impugned orders have been underlined and marked by a person other than the Court. Liberty is given to the appellants to file fresh appeals with fresh certified copies. It appears it is the regular feature of the revenue department that the appeals are being filed with underlined certified copies. We direct the registry not to accept any appeal if it is found on scrutiny that the certified copy of the impugned order is underlined and marked and must return the same. |